Literature DB >> 19713394

Electronic software significantly improves quality of handover in a London teaching hospital.

Dimitri A Raptis1, Carl Fernandes, Weiliang Chua, Paul B Boulos.   

Abstract

The study compared paper-based and electronic-based medical handover with respect to quality of information transfer during hospital out-of-hours shifts, and analysed the caseload burden of the hospital night team. The participants were 1645 hospital patients transferred from the day team to the out-of-hours team over four months in 2006. Quality of information transfer was determined by clinical data handed over within pre-set fields, and caseload burden by the frequency of tasks required at handover. Handover information fields comprised patient's demographics and location, primary diagnosis, current problem, plan of action and primary care team details. Electronic handover achieved a significantly higher number of completed fields than paper-based handover. Blood collection, checking blood and X-ray results, and adjusting fluid balance and intravenous cannulation account for most of the workload during the nightshift. Electronic handover provides better continuity of care than paper-based handover, and redistribution of tasks during working hours would benefit night staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19713394     DOI: 10.1177/1460458209337431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Informatics J        ISSN: 1460-4582            Impact factor:   2.681


  21 in total

Review 1.  Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Noa Segall; Alberto S Bonifacio; Rebecca A Schroeder; Atilio Barbeito; Dawn Rogers; Deirdre K Thornlow; James Emery; Sally Kellum; Melanie C Wright; Jonathan B Mark
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Living for the weekend: electronic documentation improves patient handover.

Authors:  Matthew Govier; Pippa Medcalf
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 3.  A systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of handoff tools: implications for research and practice.

Authors:  Joanna Abraham; Thomas Kannampallil; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Time to surgical review: an assessment of the traditional model of emergency surgical care.

Authors:  M E Kelly; C Conlon; G N Le; G J Nason; E Mansour; K C Conlon; P F Ridgway
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Handover rounds in Irish hospitals.

Authors:  J N Murphy; C A Ryan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Implementation of a surgical handover tool in a busy tertiary referral centre: a complete audit cycle.

Authors:  J P Gibbons; E Nugent; S Tierney; D Kavanagh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Chart biopsy: an emerging medical practice enabled by electronic health records and its impacts on emergency department-inpatient admission handoffs.

Authors:  Brian Hilligoss; Kai Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Evaluating Outcomes of Electronic Tools Supporting Physician Shift-to-Shift Handoffs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joshua Davis; Lee Ann Riesenberg; Matthew Mardis; John Donnelly; Branden Benningfield; Mallory Youngstrom; Imelda Vetter
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

Review 9.  Effectiveness of different nursing handover styles for ensuring continuity of information in hospitalised patients.

Authors:  Marian Smeulers; Cees Lucas; Hester Vermeulen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-24

10.  Training on handover of patient care within UK medical schools.

Authors:  Morris Gordon
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2013-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.