BACKGROUND: Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) has been proposed as an antiaging hormone, but its importance is unclear. Assessment of an individual's ability to maintain a DHEAS set point, through examination of multiple DHEAS levels over time, may provide insight into biologic aging. METHODS: Using Cox proportional hazard models, we examined the relationship between DHEAS trajectory patterns and all-cause death in 950 individuals aged >or=65 years who were enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study and had DHEAS levels measured at three to six time points. RESULTS: Overall, there was a slight decline in DHEAS levels over time (-0.013 microg/mL/y). Three trajectory components were examined: slope, variability, and baseline DHEAS. When examined individually, a steep decline or extreme variability in DHEAS levels was associated with higher mortality (p < .001 for each), whereas baseline DHEAS level was not. In adjusted models including all three components, steep decline (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, confidence interval [CI] 1.32-2.33) and extreme variability (HR 1.89, CI 1.47-2.43) remained significant predictors of mortality, whereas baseline DHEAS level remained unpredictive of mortality (HR 0.97 per standard deviation, CI 0.88-1.07). The effect of trajectory pattern was more pronounced in men than in women. Individuals with both a steep decline and extreme variability in DHEAS levels had a significantly higher death rate than those with neither pattern (141 vs 48 deaths per 1,000 person-years, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show significant heterogeneity in the individual trajectories of DHEAS levels and suggest that these trajectories provide important biologic information about the rate of aging, whereas the DHEAS level itself does not.
BACKGROUND:Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) has been proposed as an antiaging hormone, but its importance is unclear. Assessment of an individual's ability to maintain a DHEAS set point, through examination of multiple DHEAS levels over time, may provide insight into biologic aging. METHODS: Using Cox proportional hazard models, we examined the relationship between DHEAS trajectory patterns and all-cause death in 950 individuals aged >or=65 years who were enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study and had DHEAS levels measured at three to six time points. RESULTS: Overall, there was a slight decline in DHEAS levels over time (-0.013 microg/mL/y). Three trajectory components were examined: slope, variability, and baseline DHEAS. When examined individually, a steep decline or extreme variability in DHEAS levels was associated with higher mortality (p < .001 for each), whereas baseline DHEAS level was not. In adjusted models including all three components, steep decline (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, confidence interval [CI] 1.32-2.33) and extreme variability (HR 1.89, CI 1.47-2.43) remained significant predictors of mortality, whereas baseline DHEAS level remained unpredictive of mortality (HR 0.97 per standard deviation, CI 0.88-1.07). The effect of trajectory pattern was more pronounced in men than in women. Individuals with both a steep decline and extreme variability in DHEAS levels had a significantly higher death rate than those with neither pattern (141 vs 48 deaths per 1,000 person-years, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show significant heterogeneity in the individual trajectories of DHEAS levels and suggest that these trajectories provide important biologic information about the rate of aging, whereas the DHEAS level itself does not.
Authors: George S Roth; Mark A Lane; Donald K Ingram; Julie A Mattison; Dariush Elahi; Jordan D Tobin; Denis Muller; E Jeffrey Metter Journal: Science Date: 2002-08-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: S Legrain; C Massien; N Lahlou; M Roger; B Debuire; B Diquet; G Chatellier; M Azizi; V Faucounau; H Porchet; F Forette; E E Baulieu Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: L Mazat; S Lafont; C Berr; B Debuire; J F Tessier; J F Dartigues; E E Baulieu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-06-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: E E Baulieu; G Thomas; S Legrain; N Lahlou; M Roger; B Debuire; V Faucounau; L Girard; M P Hervy; F Latour; M C Leaud; A Mokrane; H Pitti-Ferrandi; C Trivalle; O de Lacharrière; S Nouveau; B Rakoto-Arison; J C Souberbielle; J Raison; Y Le Bouc; A Raynaud; X Girerd; F Forette Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-04-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: John E Nestler; John B Whitfield; Terre Y Williams; Gu Zhu; Juliann Condon; Katherine M Kirk; Andrew C Heath; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Andrea L Metti; Howard Aizenstein; Kristine Yaffe; Robert M Boudreau; Anne Newman; Lenore Launer; Peter J Gianaros; Oscar L Lopez; Judith Saxton; Diane G Ives; Stephen Kritchevsky; Abbe N Vallejo; Caterina Rosano Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Anne B Newman; Jason L Sanders; Jorge R Kizer; Robert M Boudreau; Michelle C Odden; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri; Alice M Arnold Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley; Timothy P York; Kristen C Jacobson; Lindon J Eaves; Sally P Mendoza; Dirk Hellhammer; Nicole Maninger; Seymour Levine; Sonia Lupien; Michael J Lyons; Richard Hauger; Hong Xian; Carol E Franz; William S Kremen Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Jason L Sanders; Alice M Arnold; Robert M Boudreau; Calvin H Hirsch; Jorge R Kizer; Robert C Kaplan; Anne R Cappola; Mary Cushman; Mini E Jacob; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Anne B Newman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Chrisandra Shufelt; Philip Bretsky; Cristina M Almeida; B Delia Johnson; Leslee J Shaw; Ricardo Azziz; Glenn D Braunstein; Carl J Pepine; Vera Bittner; Diane A Vido; Frank Z Stanczyk; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Robin Haring; Zhaoyang Teng; Vanessa Xanthakis; Andrea Coviello; Lisa Sullivan; Shalender Bhasin; Joanne M Murabito; Henri Wallaschofski; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Andrea L Metti; Kristine Yaffe; Robert M Boudreau; Eleanor M Simonsick; Ryan M Carnahan; Suzanne Satterfield; Tamara B Harris; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Caterina Rosano; Jane A Cauley Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Elisa Fabbri; Yang An; Marco Zoli; Eleanor M Simonsick; Jack M Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Cynthia M Boyd; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 6.053