INTRODUCTION: C-peptide measurement in blood or 24-h urine samples provides useful information regarding endogenous insulin secretion, but problems related to the rapid degradation of C-peptide in blood and difficulty of 24-h urine collection have limited widespread routine clinical use of this test. We assessed the feasibility of measuring urinary C-peptide (UCP) with correction for creatinine concentration in single urine samples. METHODS: We analyzed UCP using a routine electrochemiluminescence immunoassay in samples from 21 healthy volunteers. We investigated the stability of UCP with different preservatives and storage conditions and compared the reproducibility of urinary C-peptide/creatinine ratio (UCPCR) in first- and second-void fasting urines, then assessed correlations with 24-h collections. RESULTS: UCPCR was unchanged at room temperature for 24 h and at 4 degrees C for 72 h even in the absence of preservative. UCPCR collected in boric acid was stable at room temperature for 72 h. UCPCR remained stable after 7 freeze-thaw cycles but decreased with freezer storage time and dropped to 82%-84% of baseline by 90 days at -20 degrees C. Second-void fasting UCPCRs were lower than first-void (median 0.78 vs 1.31, P = 0.0003) and showed less variation (CV 33% vs 52%), as second-void UCPCRs were not influenced by evening food-related insulin secretion. Second-void fasting UCPCR was highly correlated with 24-h UCP (r = 0.8, P = 0.00006). CONCLUSIONS: Second-void fasting UCPCR is a reproducible measure that correlates well with 24-h UCP in normal samples. The 3-day stability of UCPCR at room temperature greatly increases its potential clinical utility.
INTRODUCTION:C-peptide measurement in blood or 24-h urine samples provides useful information regarding endogenous insulin secretion, but problems related to the rapid degradation of C-peptide in blood and difficulty of 24-h urine collection have limited widespread routine clinical use of this test. We assessed the feasibility of measuring urinary C-peptide (UCP) with correction for creatinine concentration in single urine samples. METHODS: We analyzed UCP using a routine electrochemiluminescence immunoassay in samples from 21 healthy volunteers. We investigated the stability of UCP with different preservatives and storage conditions and compared the reproducibility of urinary C-peptide/creatinine ratio (UCPCR) in first- and second-void fasting urines, then assessed correlations with 24-h collections. RESULTS: UCPCR was unchanged at room temperature for 24 h and at 4 degrees C for 72 h even in the absence of preservative. UCPCR collected in boric acid was stable at room temperature for 72 h. UCPCR remained stable after 7 freeze-thaw cycles but decreased with freezer storage time and dropped to 82%-84% of baseline by 90 days at -20 degrees C. Second-void fasting UCPCRs were lower than first-void (median 0.78 vs 1.31, P = 0.0003) and showed less variation (CV 33% vs 52%), as second-void UCPCRs were not influenced by evening food-related insulin secretion. Second-void fasting UCPCR was highly correlated with 24-h UCP (r = 0.8, P = 0.00006). CONCLUSIONS: Second-void fasting UCPCR is a reproducible measure that correlates well with 24-h UCP in normal samples. The 3-day stability of UCPCR at room temperature greatly increases its potential clinical utility.
Authors: Beverley M Shields; Maggie Shepherd; Michelle Hudson; Timothy J McDonald; Kevin Colclough; Jaime Peters; Bridget Knight; Chris Hyde; Sian Ellard; Ewan R Pearson; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Maggie Shepherd; Beverley Shields; Suzanne Hammersley; Michelle Hudson; Timothy J McDonald; Kevin Colclough; Richard A Oram; Bridget Knight; Christopher Hyde; Julian Cox; Katherine Mallam; Christopher Moudiotis; Rebecca Smith; Barbara Fraser; Simon Robertson; Stephen Greene; Sian Ellard; Ewan R Pearson; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Richard A Oram; Timothy J McDonald; Beverley M Shields; Michelle M Hudson; Maggie H Shepherd; Suzanne Hammersley; Ewan R Pearson; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Angus G Jones; Rachel Ej Besser; Beverley M Shields; Timothy J McDonald; Suzy V Hope; Bridget A Knight; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: Rachel E J Besser; Johnny Ludvigsson; Angus G Jones; Timothy J McDonald; Beverley M Shields; Bridget A Knight; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rachel E J Besser; Maggie H Shepherd; Timothy J McDonald; Beverley M Shields; Bridget A Knight; Sian Ellard; Andrew T Hattersley Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 19.112