BACKGROUND: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells support proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Since these cells constitute a rare subset of bone marrow cells, mesenchymal stem cell preparations for clinical purposes require a preparative step of ex vivo multiplication. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of culture duration on mesenchymal stem cell supportive activity. DESIGN AND METHODS: Mesenchymal stem cells were expanded for up to ten passages. These cells and CD34+ cells were seeded in cytokine-free co-cultures after which the phenotype, clonogenic capacity and in vivo repopulating activity of harvested hematopoietic cells were assessed. RESULTS: Early passage mesenchymal stem cells supported hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion and differentiation toward both B lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Late passage mesenchymal stem cells did not support hematopoietic progenitor cell and myeloid cell outgrowth but maintained B-cell supportive ability. In vitro maintenance of NOD/SCID mouse repopulating cells cultured for 1 week in contact with mesenchymal stem cells was effective until the fourth passage of the mesenchymal cells and declined thereafter. The levels of engraftment of CD34(+) cells in NOD/SCID mice was higher when these cells were co-injected with early passage mesenchymal stem cells; however mesenchymal cells expanded beyond nine passages were ineffective in promoting CD34(+) cell engraftment. Non-contact cultures indicated that mesenchymal stem cell supportive activity involved diffusible factors. Among these, interleukins 6 and 8 contributed to the supportive activity of early passage mesenchymal stem cells but not to those of late passage cells. The phenotype, as well as fat, bone and cartilage differentiation capacity, of mesenchymal stem cells did not change during their culture. Conclusions Extended culture of mesenchymal stem cells alters the ability of these cells to support hematopoietic progenitor cells without causing concomitant changes in their phenotype or differentiation capacity.
BACKGROUND: Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells support proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Since these cells constitute a rare subset of bone marrow cells, mesenchymal stem cell preparations for clinical purposes require a preparative step of ex vivo multiplication. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of culture duration on mesenchymal stem cell supportive activity. DESIGN AND METHODS: Mesenchymal stem cells were expanded for up to ten passages. These cells and CD34+ cells were seeded in cytokine-free co-cultures after which the phenotype, clonogenic capacity and in vivo repopulating activity of harvested hematopoietic cells were assessed. RESULTS: Early passage mesenchymal stem cells supported hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion and differentiation toward both B lymphoid and myeloid lineages. Late passage mesenchymal stem cells did not support hematopoietic progenitor cell and myeloid cell outgrowth but maintained B-cell supportive ability. In vitro maintenance of NOD/SCIDmouse repopulating cells cultured for 1 week in contact with mesenchymal stem cells was effective until the fourth passage of the mesenchymal cells and declined thereafter. The levels of engraftment of CD34(+) cells in NOD/SCIDmice was higher when these cells were co-injected with early passage mesenchymal stem cells; however mesenchymal cells expanded beyond nine passages were ineffective in promoting CD34(+) cell engraftment. Non-contact cultures indicated that mesenchymal stem cell supportive activity involved diffusible factors. Among these, interleukins 6 and 8 contributed to the supportive activity of early passage mesenchymal stem cells but not to those of late passage cells. The phenotype, as well as fat, bone and cartilage differentiation capacity, of mesenchymal stem cells did not change during their culture. Conclusions Extended culture of mesenchymal stem cells alters the ability of these cells to support hematopoietic progenitor cells without causing concomitant changes in their phenotype or differentiation capacity.
Authors: Wolfgang Wagner; Frederik Wein; Christoph Roderburg; Rainer Saffrich; Anne Faber; Ulf Krause; Mario Schubert; Vladimir Benes; Volker Eckstein; Holger Maul; Anthony D Ho Journal: Exp Hematol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Reza Izadpanah; Deepak Kaushal; Christopher Kriedt; Fern Tsien; Bindiya Patel; Jason Dufour; Bruce A Bunnell Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Katarina Le Blanc; Francesco Frassoni; Lynne Ball; Franco Locatelli; Helene Roelofs; Ian Lewis; Edoardo Lanino; Berit Sundberg; Maria Ester Bernardo; Mats Remberger; Giorgio Dini; R Maarten Egeler; Andrea Bacigalupo; Willem Fibbe; Olle Ringdén Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-05-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maroun Khoury; Adam Drake; Qingfeng Chen; Di Dong; Ilya Leskov; Maria F Fragoso; Yan Li; Bettina P Iliopoulou; William Hwang; Harvey F Lodish; Jianzhu Chen Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Daniel J Medina; Lauri Goodell; John Glod; Céline Gélinas; Arnold B Rabson; Roger K Strair Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Bonnie L Barrilleaux; Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck; Jennifer K Gilliam; Donald G Phinney; Kim C O'Connor Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 2.416
Authors: A Daisy Goodrich; Nicole M Varain; Christine M Jeanblanc; Donna M Colon; Jaehyup Kim; Esmail D Zanjani; Peiman Hematti Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.414