Literature DB >> 19713027

Age-specific differences in the treatment of cervical cancer in the east and the south of The Netherlands 1989-2004.

Maaike A van der Aa1, Sabine Siesling, Lonneke V v d Poll-Franse, Eltjo M Schutter, Marnix L Lybeert, Jan Willem W Coebergh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe trends and variation in treatment and survival of cervical cancer in two regions in The Netherlands and to relate this to adherence to the treatment recommendations. STUDY
DESIGN: Patient characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment and follow-up data were collected for 1954 cervical cancer cases diagnosed in the period 1989-2004.
RESULTS: In FIGO stages IB-IIA 93% of patients were treated according to the recommendations of The Netherlands Working Group Gynaecologic Oncology. Older patients received radiotherapy more often than younger patients: 48% (95%CI 40-57) of patients older than 70 compared to 15% (95%CI 10-20) of patients aged 50-69 and 5% (95%CI 3-7) of patients aged 50 or younger (p<0.05). In FIGO stages IIB-IVA 76% of patients were treated according to the recommendations of the Working Group. Chemoradiation was given to older patients less often than to younger patients: 2% (95%CI 0.5-5) versus 23% (95%CI 16-29). A decreased risk of death was found for patients receiving chemoradiation (RER 0.6, 95%CI 0.3-0.9) compared to those receiving "radiotherapy only".
CONCLUSION: Far from being always followed, the treatment recommendations were better implemented for treatment of patients with FIGO IB-IIA. Elderly patients received different treatment compared to younger patients in this study and showed an independent increased risk of death in the lower stages, which confirms that the need becomes stronger for paying attention to treatment of elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19713027     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Safety and tolerance of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Erin M George; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; William M Burke; Sharyn N Lewin; Eri Prendergast; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Management of elderly women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Holm Eggemann; Tanja Ignatov; Christina Henrike Geyken; Stephan Seitz; Atanas Ignatov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The evaluation of older patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ying Gao; Jin-lu Ma; Fei Gao; Li-ping Song
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Effect of changes in treatment practice on survival for cervical cancer: results from a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Yoon-Jung Kang; Dianne L O'Connell; Robert Lotocki; Erich V Kliewer; David E Goldsbury; Alain A Demers; Karen Canfell
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  How well do elderly patients with cervical cancer tolerate definitive radiochemotherapy using RapidArc? Results from an institutional audit comparing elderly versus younger patients.

Authors:  Santam Chakraborty; M Geetha; Sampada Dessai; Vijay M Patil
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-11-20

6.  Current management of cervical cancer in Poland-Analysis of the questionnaire trial for the years 2002-2014 in relation to ASCO 2016 recommendations.

Authors:  Tomasz Basta; Paweł Knapp; Paweł Blecharz; Lubomir Bodnar; Iwona Gawron; Dorota Babczyk; Magdalena Piróg; Tomasz Kluz; Anna Markowska; Anna Horbaczewska; Robert Jach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.