Literature DB >> 19712931

Statistical estimation of diagnosis with genetic markers based on decision tree analysis of complex disease.

Liu Hui1, Gai Liping.   

Abstract

To explore combinations of genetic markers and to estimate their joint action, decision trees are built on the basis of marker frequencies in both disease and control groups. Youden's index (0.1-0.9 for a single marker) is calculated for genetic markers with different diagnostic capacities. When 23 single genetic markers with diagnostic power 0.10 are combined, the resulting diagnostic power is 0.5. Medium diagnostic power (Youden's index 0.7) can be obtained by combining four low effect diagnostic items. High diagnostic power (Youden's index 0.9) can be obtained by combining either eight low power items or four medium power ones. This implies that selection of about 100 genetic markers, differing in capacity to distinguish between the disease and control groups by (say) 10%, will meet the requirement for clinic diagnosis. Thus, diagnosis of complex diseases by genetic markers is possible through the discovery and characterization of markers throughout the human genome and the development of genotyping technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19712931     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  4 in total

1.  Four-protein model for predicting prognostic risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Minghui Wang; Lin Feng; Jie Song; Xin Dong; Ting Xiao; Shujun Cheng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 9.927

2.  An Angle Compared Index with Hybrid of Changes in the Ratio and Amplitude for Quantitative Evaluation of Disease Risk, Biological Function, and Biomarker Efficacy.

Authors:  Jin Xiaojun; Liu Hui
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Need for discriminating between diagnostic and screening efficacy to estimate a biomarker based on case control and cohort studies.

Authors:  Liu Hui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Analyzing the Relationship between Cohort and Case-Control Study Results Based on Model for Multiple Pathogenic Factors.

Authors:  Hui Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.238

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.