OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the 80-hour workweek restrictions on resident education within surgical programs in the New England area. DESIGN: Web-based survey. SETTING: All Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited surgical residency programs in New England (n = 20). PARTICIPANTS: Program directors/coordinators in each surgical residency program in New England. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First, American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores and the passing rate of the ABS certifying examination were recorded for the years 2001, 2002, 2005, and 2006. Second, the changes in the curriculum of surgical education were documented as perceived by program coordinators and directors. RESULTS: In all, 85% (17/20) of surgical programs in New England responded to the survey. The programs began to implement the 80-hour workweek from 2002 to 2004. An equal distribution of community (n = 8) and university programs (n = 9) was sampled. Prior to the initiation of the 80-hour workweek, residency programs emphasized weekly didactic sessions given by attending physicians (88%), mock orals (88%), and conventional journal club (76%). After the 80-hour workweek was implemented, the education curriculum most often consisted of didactic sessions by attending (100%), mock orals (88%), and simulation laboratories (75%). No difference was observed in ABSITE scores and first-time pass rates of the ABS examination before or after the introduction of the 80-hour workweek (20% response). Only 25% of programs felt that surgical education was improved after the implementation of the 80-hour workweek, whereas 31% felt education was worse. Overall, 44% of respondents believed that there was no difference in surgical education. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive effects the 80-hour workweek has had on resident quality of life and patient care, it does not seem that either significant improvements or detrimental effects have occurred on surgical education within residency programs in New England.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the 80-hour workweek restrictions on resident education within surgical programs in the New England area. DESIGN: Web-based survey. SETTING: All Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited surgical residency programs in New England (n = 20). PARTICIPANTS: Program directors/coordinators in each surgical residency program in New England. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First, American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores and the passing rate of the ABS certifying examination were recorded for the years 2001, 2002, 2005, and 2006. Second, the changes in the curriculum of surgical education were documented as perceived by program coordinators and directors. RESULTS: In all, 85% (17/20) of surgical programs in New England responded to the survey. The programs began to implement the 80-hour workweek from 2002 to 2004. An equal distribution of community (n = 8) and university programs (n = 9) was sampled. Prior to the initiation of the 80-hour workweek, residency programs emphasized weekly didactic sessions given by attending physicians (88%), mock orals (88%), and conventional journal club (76%). After the 80-hour workweek was implemented, the education curriculum most often consisted of didactic sessions by attending (100%), mock orals (88%), and simulation laboratories (75%). No difference was observed in ABSITE scores and first-time pass rates of the ABS examination before or after the introduction of the 80-hour workweek (20% response). Only 25% of programs felt that surgical education was improved after the implementation of the 80-hour workweek, whereas 31% felt education was worse. Overall, 44% of respondents believed that there was no difference in surgical education. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive effects the 80-hour workweek has had on resident quality of life and patient care, it does not seem that either significant improvements or detrimental effects have occurred on surgical education within residency programs in New England.
Authors: Cecelia N Theobald; Daniel G Stover; Neesha N Choma; Jacob Hathaway; Jennifer K Green; Neeraja B Peterson; Kelly C Sponsler; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Sunil Kripalani; John Sergent; Nancy J Brown; Joshua C Denny Journal: Acad Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: M Sand; S Hessam; D Sand; F G Bechara; C Vorstius; M Bromba; E Stockfleth; I Shiue Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Eddie Blay; D Brock Hewitt; Jeanette W Chung; Thomas Biester; James F Fiore; Allison R Dahlke; Christopher M Quinn; Frank R Lewis; Karl Y Bilimoria Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Francis L Counselman; Terry Kowalenko; Catherine A Marco; Kevin B Joldersma; Robert C Korte; Earl J Reisdorff Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2016-10
Authors: Michael Sand; Schapoor Hessam; Falk G Bechara; Daniel Sand; Christian Vorstius; Michael Bromba; Eggert Stockfleth; Ivy Shiue Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 1.852