Literature DB >> 1971234

Chorionic villus sampling and rare side-effects: will a randomised controlled trial detect them?

R W Orrell1, R J Lilford.   

Abstract

Controlled trials have been instigated, comparing the results and complications of chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis. At present most attention has focused on the miscarriage rate, which itself requires large numbers to provide studies of reasonable power. This paper describes a case of stillbirth due to massive placental abruption following CVS. The size of trial needed to provide sufficient power to detect a range of realistic postulated changes in the incidence of this or other important possible complications is calculated. It would appear that the size of sample required is very large, and that present trials will not succeed in detecting possible important differences in late obstetric, neonatal, and other long term complications of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1971234     DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(90)90978-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  2 in total

1.  The rise and fall of chorionic villus sampling.

Authors:  R J Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-19

2.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 1. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down syndrome. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  P T Dick
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.