Literature DB >> 19712132

Primary urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract: important clinicopathological factors predicting bladder recurrence after surgical resection.

Wen-Wei Huang1, Hsuan-Ying Huang, Alex C Liao, Yow-Ling Shiue, Hsiu-Lun Tai, Chun-Mao Lin, Yu-Hui Wang, Ching-Nan Lin, Kun-Hung Shen, Chien-Feng Li.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to further characterize potential clinicopathological predictors for urinary bladder recurrence-free survival (UBRFS) in patients with primary urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UUT-UC). The present series included 385 cases of surgically treated primary localized UUT-UC without previous or concurrent urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Among the 374 patients with follow-up information, clinicopathological features and therapeutic information including whether they received a laparoscopy-assisted nephroureterectomy (LNU) and adjuvant chemotherapy were correlated with UBRFS. After a median follow up of 69 months, 86 patients (23%) developed urinary bladder recurrence. The median time to develop urinary bladder recurrence was 12 months. At the univariate level, an increment in histological grade (P= 0.0321), a prominent papillary configuration (P= 0.0004), LNU (P= 0.0397) and male gender (P= 0.0401) significantly predicted an inferior UBRFS. At the multivariate level, increase of histological grade (P < 0.0001, relative risk (RR) = 3.776), prominent papillary configuration (P < 0.0001, RR = 3.244), and male gender (P= 0.0463, RR = 1.444) independently predicted UBRFS. In conclusion, male patients and those with high-grade and papillary UUT-UC, and who received LNU had higher risks of urinary bladder recurrence. Accordingly, for these patients, more intensive follow up coupled with postoperative intravesical adjuvant therapy to prevent urinary bladder recurrence should also be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19712132     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02420.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Int        ISSN: 1320-5463            Impact factor:   2.534


  16 in total

1.  Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and disease-specific survival associated with surgical technique?

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Daher C Chade; Guilherme Godoy; Matthew Kaag; Angel M Cronin; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Canadian guidelines for postoperative surveillance of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher B Allard; Peter Black; Wassim Kassouf; Christopher Morash; Ricardo Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  HAS3 underexpression as an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and urinary bladder.

Authors:  I-Wei Chang; Peir-In Liang; Ching-Chia Li; Wen-Jeng Wu; Chun-Nung Huang; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin; Chao-Tien Hsu; Hong-Lin He; Ting-Feng Wu; Chih-Hsin Hung; Chien-Feng Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-05-02

4.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

5.  CDCA5 overexpression is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract and urinary bladder.

Authors:  I-Wei Chang; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin; Hong-Lin He; Chao-Tien Hsu; Ching-Chia Li; Wen-Jeng Wu; Chun-Nung Huang; Ting-Feng Wu; Chien-Feng Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  GPX2 underexpression indicates poor prognosis in patients with urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract and urinary bladder.

Authors:  I-Wei Chang; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin; Chih-Hsin Hung; Hua-Pin Wang; Yung-Yao Lin; Wen-Jeng Wu; Chun-Nung Huang; Ching-Chia Li; Wei-Ming Li; Jui-Yu Wu; Chien-Feng Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Are there differences between de novo and secondary upper tract urothelial carcinoma tumours?

Authors:  Hanan Goldberg; Douglas C Cheung; Thenappan Chandrasekar; Zachary Klaassen; Christopher J D Wallis; Girish S Kulkarni; Rashid Sayyid; Andrew Evans; Mehdi Masoomian; Bharati Bapat; Theodorus van der Kwast; Robert J Hamilton; Alexandre Zlotta; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Predictive factors of recurrence and survival of upper tract urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Grégory Verhoest; Shahrokh F Shariat; Thomas F Chromecki; Jay D Raman; Vitaly Margulis; Giacomo Novara; Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Morgan Rouprêt; Douglas S Scherr; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Long-term results of retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma in China.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Wang; Feng-Ming Jiang; Qi-Hui Chen; Yu-Chuan Hou; Hai-Feng Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Hao; Long Zhang; Chun-Xi Wang
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung Suk Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.