OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study evaluated the influence of cavity preparation using the Er:YAG laser and restorative materials containing fluoride on preventing caries lesions. BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cavity preparation using the Er:YAG laser has a potential for improving resistance to secondary caries on enamel. METHODS: Forty unerupted human third molars teeth were sectioned into 72 blocks of dental enamel and distributed into two groups to prepare cavities measuring (1.6 mm diameter) with diamond burs (DB) or Er:YAG laser (LA; 6 Hz, 300 mJ, 47 J/cm(2)). After that, each group was divided into three subgroups and restored with a glass-ionomer cement (GI), a resin-modified glass-ionomer (RM), or a composite resin (CR). Blocks were thermal cycled and submitted to a pH challenge to develop artificial caries-like lesions. Lesions were evaluated by Knoop microhardness test. An average of four indentations was used. Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. RESULTS: The results (in Knoop hardness number) for DB cavity preparation were GI, 235.5 (+/-75.5); RM, 137.1 (+/-64.1); and CR, 39.3 (+/-26.5). For LA cavity preparation, the results were GI, 410.0 (+/-129.7); RM, 310.3 (+/-119.5); and CR, 96.4 (+/-57.4). CONCLUSIONS: There was less development of caries lesion around LA-prepared cavities than around the DB-prepared cavities; however, no synergistic cariostatic effect was observed between the Er:YAG laser and glass ionomer cement.
OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study evaluated the influence of cavity preparation using the Er:YAG laser and restorative materials containing fluoride on preventing caries lesions. BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that cavity preparation using the Er:YAG laser has a potential for improving resistance to secondary caries on enamel. METHODS: Forty unerupted human third molars teeth were sectioned into 72 blocks of dental enamel and distributed into two groups to prepare cavities measuring (1.6 mm diameter) with diamond burs (DB) or Er:YAG laser (LA; 6 Hz, 300 mJ, 47 J/cm(2)). After that, each group was divided into three subgroups and restored with a glass-ionomer cement (GI), a resin-modified glass-ionomer (RM), or a composite resin (CR). Blocks were thermal cycled and submitted to a pH challenge to develop artificial caries-like lesions. Lesions were evaluated by Knoop microhardness test. An average of four indentations was used. Statistical analyses were performed by ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. RESULTS: The results (in Knoop hardness number) for DB cavity preparation were GI, 235.5 (+/-75.5); RM, 137.1 (+/-64.1); and CR, 39.3 (+/-26.5). For LA cavity preparation, the results were GI, 410.0 (+/-129.7); RM, 310.3 (+/-119.5); and CR, 96.4 (+/-57.4). CONCLUSIONS: There was less development of caries lesion around LA-prepared cavities than around the DB-prepared cavities; however, no synergistic cariostatic effect was observed between the Er:YAG laser and glass ionomer cement.
Authors: Josiane Marques de Sena Popoff; José Augusto Rodrigues; Wanessa Maria De Freitas Aras; Alessandra Cassoni Journal: Photomed Laser Surg Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 2.796