Literature DB >> 19711919

Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.

Chresten R Søndergaard1, Alison Elizabeth Garrett, Tommy Carstensen, Gianluca Pollastri, Jens Erik Nielsen.   

Abstract

The development of docking scoring functions requires high-resolution 3D structures of protein-ligand complexes for which the binding affinity of the ligand has been measured experimentally. Protein-ligand binding affinities are measured in solution experiments, and high resolution protein-ligand structures can be determined only by X-ray crystallography. Protein-ligand scoring functions must therefore reproduce solution binding energies using analyses of proteins in a crystal environment. We present an analysis of the prevalence of crystal-induced artifacts and water-mediated contacts in protein-ligand complexes and demonstrate the effect that these can have on the performance of protein-ligand scoring functions. We find 36% of ligands in the PDBBind 2007 refined data set to be influenced by crystal contacts and find the performance of a scoring function to be affected by these. A Web server for detecting crystal contacts in protein-ligand complexes is available at http://enzyme.ucd.ie/LIGCRYST .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19711919     DOI: 10.1021/jm8016464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  17 in total

1.  Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping.

Authors:  Michael D Tyka; Daniel A Keedy; Ingemar André; Frank Dimaio; Yifan Song; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Structures of designed armadillo repeat proteins binding to peptides fused to globular domains.

Authors:  Simon Hansen; Jonathan D Kiefer; Chaithanya Madhurantakam; Peer R E Mittl; Andreas Plückthun
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  A consistent description of HYdrogen bond and DEhydration energies in protein-ligand complexes: methods behind the HYDE scoring function.

Authors:  Nadine Schneider; Gudrun Lange; Sally Hindle; Robert Klein; Matthias Rarey
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Ligand Identification Scoring Algorithm (LISA).

Authors:  Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Dynameomics: data-driven methods and models for utilizing large-scale protein structure repositories for improving fragment-based loop prediction.

Authors:  Steven J Rysavy; David A C Beck; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Measuring Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons.

Authors:  Seth Villarreal; Sung Hoon Lee; Ling-Gang Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  VoteDock: consensus docking method for prediction of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski; Michał Łaźniewski; Marcin von Grotthuss; Leszek Rychlewski; Krzysztof Ginalski
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 8.  Investigating Cryptic Binding Sites by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Antonija Kuzmanic; Gregory R Bowman; Jordi Juarez-Jimenez; Julien Michel; Francesco L Gervasio
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 22.384

9.  Protein camouflage in cytochrome c-calixarene complexes.

Authors:  Róise E McGovern; Humberto Fernandes; Amir R Khan; Nicholas P Power; Peter B Crowley
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 10.  The eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E in the nucleus: taking the road less traveled.

Authors:  Michael J Osborne; Katherine L B Borden
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.