Literature DB >> 19711475

Finite element analyses of ankylosaurid dinosaur tail club impacts.

Victoria M Arbour1, Eric Snively.   

Abstract

Ankylosaurid dinosaurs have modified distal caudal vertebrae (the handle) and large terminal caudal osteoderms (the knob) that together form a tail club. Three-dimensional digital models of four tail clubs referred to Euoplocephalus tutus were created from computed tomography scans of fossil specimens. We propose to use finite element modeling to examine the distribution of stress in simulated tail club impacts in order to determine the biological feasibility of hypothesized tail clubbing behavior. Results show that peak stresses were artificially high at the rigid constraint. The data suggest that tail clubs with small and average-sized knobs were unlikely to fail during forceful impacts, but large clubs may have been at risk of fracture cranial to the knob. The modified handle vertebrae were capable of supporting the weight of even very large knobs. Long prezygapophyses and neural spines in the handle vertebrae helped distribute stress evenly along the handle. We conclude that tail swinging-behavior may have been possible in Euoplocephalus, but more sophisticated models incorporating flexible constraints are needed to support this hypothesis. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19711475     DOI: 10.1002/ar.20987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  9 in total

1.  Ankylosaurid dinosaur tail clubs evolved through stepwise acquisition of key features.

Authors:  Victoria M Arbour; Philip J Currie
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The evolution of tail weaponization in amniotes.

Authors:  Victoria M Arbour; Lindsay E Zanno
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Biomechanical implications of intraspecific shape variation in chimpanzee crania: moving toward an integration of geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Model sensitivity and use of the comparative finite element method in mammalian jaw mechanics: mandible performance in the gray wolf.

Authors:  Zhijie Jack Tseng; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Henryk Flashner; Xiaoming Wang; Reyes Enciso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Common functional correlates of head-strike behavior in the pachycephalosaur Stegoceras validum (Ornithischia, Dinosauria) and combative artiodactyls.

Authors:  Eric Snively; Jessica M Theodor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analyzing taphonomic deformation of ankylosaur skulls using retrodeformation and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Victoria M Arbour; Philip J Currie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Developmental finite element analysis of cichlid pharyngeal jaws: Quantifying the generation of a key innovation.

Authors:  Tim Peterson; Gerd B Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An exceptionally preserved armored dinosaur reveals the morphology and allometry of osteoderms and their horny epidermal coverings.

Authors:  Caleb M Brown
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  The efficacy of computed tomography scanning versus surface scanning in 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Andre J Rowe; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.061

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.