Literature DB >> 19711474

Femoral strength and posture in terrestrial birds and non-avian theropods.

Andrew A Farke1, Justy Alicea.   

Abstract

Osteological and experimental evidence suggest a change in femoral posture between non-avian dinosaurs (in which the femur presumably was carried in a subvertical position) and birds (in which the femur is held nearly horizontal during most phases of terrestrial locomotion). In this study, we used a broad comparative sample to test the hypothesis that cross-sectional properties of the femur records evidence of this presumed change in posture. I(max) and I(min) (second moment of area, related to resistance to bending) and cross-sectional area (indicating resistance to compression) were measured from computed tomography scans of the femora of 30 species of flightless or primarily terrestrial birds, one probable non-dinosaur dinosauromorph, and at least four species of non-avian theropods. It was predicted that birds should have more eccentrically shaped femoral midshafts as measured by I(max)/II(min) (reflecting greater bending) and comparatively smaller cross-sectional areas than non-avians. Results show that no significant differences occur between non-avian dinosaurs and birds for any parameter, and the samples overlapped broadly in many cases. Thus, cross-sectional properties cannot be used to infer differences in femoral posture between the two groups. This surprising finding might be explained by the fact that femoral postures were not drastically different or that a gradation of postures occurred in each sample. It is also possible that bone loading during life was not closely correlated with cross-sectional morphology. We conclude that cross-sectional properties should be used with caution in determining the posture and behaviors of extinct animals, and only in conjunction with other morphological information. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19711474     DOI: 10.1002/ar.20963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  6 in total

1.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part I-an examination of cancellous bone architecture in the hindlimb bones of theropods.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Andrew A Farke; Belinda R Beck; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Finite element modelling versus classic beam theory: comparing methods for stress estimation in a morphologically diverse sample of vertebrate long bones.

Authors:  Charlotte A Brassey; Lee Margetts; Andrew C Kitchener; Philip J Withers; Phillip L Manning; William I Sellers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Whole-bone scaling of the avian pelvic limb.

Authors:  Michael Doube; Stephanie C W Yen; Michał M Kłosowski; Andrew A Farke; John R Hutchinson; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  A universal scaling relationship between body mass and proximal limb bone dimensions in quadrupedal terrestrial tetrapods.

Authors:  Nicolás E Campione; David C Evans
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Walking like dinosaurs: chickens with artificial tails provide clues about non-avian theropod locomotion.

Authors:  Bruno Grossi; José Iriarte-Díaz; Omar Larach; Mauricio Canals; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Adaptive bill morphology for enhanced tool manipulation in New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Hiroshi Matsui; Gavin R Hunt; Katja Oberhofer; Naomichi Ogihara; Kevin J McGowan; Kumar Mithraratne; Takeshi Yamasaki; Russell D Gray; Ei-Ichi Izawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.