L Friberg1, N Hammar, M Rosenqvist. 1. Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute at South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. leif.friberg@ki.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies of patients with heart failure and of patients receiving intensive care indicate that digoxin may increase mortality if the patient has atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective To study which patients receive digoxin treatment for AF and what the prognosis is for patients given this treatment. METHOD: 2824 patients with AF were studied prospectively for a mean of 4.6 years. Information about medication was obtained from the local hospital registry. Information about diagnoses, hospitalisations and deaths was obtained from national registries. Propensity score matching and Cox regression was used to account for confounding. RESULTS: Factors associated with digoxin use were permanent AF (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.2, confidence interval (CI) 2.7 to 3.9), absence of pacemaker (HR = 2.3, CI 1.6 to 3.2), history of heart failure (HR = 2.0, CI 1.7 to 2.5), treatment in an internal medicine ward rather than a cardiology ward (HR = 1.6, CI 1.3 to 2.0), female sex (HR = 1.6, CI 1.3 to 1.9) and age >or=80 years (HR = 1.4, CI 1.1 to 1.7). More patients with than without digoxin died (51% vs 31%, p<0.001). After adjustment for covariates, however, no disadvantages related to digoxin use could be found for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, time to readmission to hospital or days at hospital/year at risk. The only end point significantly associated with digoxin use was pacemaker implantations, which were more common in digoxin-treated patients (HR = 2.0, CI 1.2 to 3.4). CONCLUSION: Digoxin is mainly given to an elderly and frailer subset of patients with AF and is thus associated with an increased mortality. When differences in patient characteristics are accounted for digoxin use seems to have a neutral effect on mortality and major cardiovascular events in patients with AF.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies of patients with heart failure and of patients receiving intensive care indicate that digoxin may increase mortality if the patient has atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective To study which patients receive digoxin treatment for AF and what the prognosis is for patients given this treatment. METHOD: 2824 patients with AF were studied prospectively for a mean of 4.6 years. Information about medication was obtained from the local hospital registry. Information about diagnoses, hospitalisations and deaths was obtained from national registries. Propensity score matching and Cox regression was used to account for confounding. RESULTS: Factors associated with digoxin use were permanent AF (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.2, confidence interval (CI) 2.7 to 3.9), absence of pacemaker (HR = 2.3, CI 1.6 to 3.2), history of heart failure (HR = 2.0, CI 1.7 to 2.5), treatment in an internal medicine ward rather than a cardiology ward (HR = 1.6, CI 1.3 to 2.0), female sex (HR = 1.6, CI 1.3 to 1.9) and age >or=80 years (HR = 1.4, CI 1.1 to 1.7). More patients with than without digoxin died (51% vs 31%, p<0.001). After adjustment for covariates, however, no disadvantages related to digoxin use could be found for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, time to readmission to hospital or days at hospital/year at risk. The only end point significantly associated with digoxin use was pacemaker implantations, which were more common in digoxin-treated patients (HR = 2.0, CI 1.2 to 3.4). CONCLUSION:Digoxin is mainly given to an elderly and frailer subset of patients with AF and is thus associated with an increased mortality. When differences in patient characteristics are accounted for digoxin use seems to have a neutral effect on mortality and major cardiovascular events in patients with AF.
Authors: Mintu P Turakhia; Pasquale Santangeli; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Xiangyan Xu; Aditya J Ullal; Claire T Than; Susan Schmitt; Tyson H Holmes; Susan M Frayne; Ciaran S Phibbs; Felix Yang; Donald D Hoang; P Michael Ho; Paul A Heidenreich Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: James V Freeman; Kristi Reynolds; Margaret Fang; Natalia Udaltsova; Anthony Steimle; Niela K Pomernacki; Leila H Borowsky; Teresa N Harrison; Daniel E Singer; Alan S Go Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-11-20
Authors: Liang-Han Ling; Peter M Kistler; Jonathan M Kalman; Richard J Schilling; Ross J Hunter Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Surbhi Chamaria; Anand M Desai; Pratap C Reddy; Brian Olshansky; Paari Dominic Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 1.866
Authors: Oliver J Ziff; Deirdre A Lane; Monica Samra; Michael Griffith; Paulus Kirchhof; Gregory Y H Lip; Richard P Steeds; Jonathan Townend; Dipak Kotecha Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-08-30