Literature DB >> 19709754

Effectiveness of a quantitative electroencephalographic biomarker for predicting differential response or remission with escitalopram and bupropion in major depressive disorder.

Andrew F Leuchter1, Ian A Cook, William S Gilmer, Lauren B Marangell, Karl S Burgoyne, Robert H Howland, Madhukar H Trivedi, Sidney Zisook, Rakesh Jain, Maurizio Fava, Dan Iosifescu, Scott Greenwald.   

Abstract

We examined the Antidepressant Treatment Response (ATR) index as a predictor of differential response and remission to escitalopram, bupropion, or a combination of the two medications, in subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD). Three hundred seventy-five subjects had a baseline quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) study preceding 1 week of treatment with escitalopram, 10 mg, after which a second QEEG was performed and the ATR index was calculated. Subjects then were randomized to continue escitalopram, switch to bupropion, or receive a combination of the two. Clinical response was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 49 days of treatment. Accuracy of ATR in predicting response and remission was calculated. There were no significant differences between response and remission rates in the three treatment groups. A single ATR threshold was useful for predicting differential response to either escitalopram or bupropion monotherapy. Subjects with ATR values above the threshold were more than 2.4 times as likely to respond to escitalopram as those with low ATR values (68% vs. 28%). Subjects with ATR values below the threshold who were switched to bupropion treatment were 1.9 times as likely to respond to bupropion alone as those who remained on escitalopram treatment (53% vs. 28%). The ATR index did not provide a useful prediction of response to combination treatment. The ATR index may prove useful in predicting responsiveness to different antidepressant medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19709754     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  35 in total

1.  An Electrophysiological Biomarker That May Predict Treatment Response to ECT.

Authors:  Katherine W Scangos; Richard D Weiner; Edward C Coffey; Andrew D Krystal
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.635

2.  Prospective testing of a neurophysiologic biomarker for treatment decisions in major depressive disorder: The PRISE-MD trial.

Authors:  Ian A Cook; Aimee M Hunter; Marissa M Caudill; Michelle J Abrams; Andrew F Leuchter
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  The antidepressant treatment response index and treatment outcomes in a placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine.

Authors:  Aimee M Hunter; Ian A Cook; Scott D Greenwald; Melody L Tran; Kate N Miyamoto; Andrew F Leuchter
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  The effectiveness of prefrontal theta cordance and early reduction of depressive symptoms in the prediction of antidepressant treatment outcome in patients with resistant depression: analysis of naturalistic data.

Authors:  Martin Bares; Tomas Novak; Miloslav Kopecek; Martin Brunovsky; Pavla Stopkova; Cyril Höschl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Complexity of resting-state EEG activity in the patients with early-stage Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Guo-Sheng Yi; Jiang Wang; Bin Deng; Xi-Le Wei
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Transcranial low-level infrared laser irradiation ameliorates depression induced by reserpine in rats.

Authors:  Haitham S Mohammed
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Combining Antidepressants in Acute Treatment of Depression: A Meta-Analysis of 38 Studies Including 4511 Patients.

Authors:  Jonathan Henssler; Tom Bschor; Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  Electroencephalographic Biomarkers for Treatment Response Prediction in Major Depressive Illness: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alik S Widge; M Taha Bilge; Rebecca Montana; Weilynn Chang; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Thilo Deckersbach; Linda L Carpenter; Ned H Kalin; Charles B Nemeroff
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Pioneering first steps and cautious conclusions.

Authors:  Francis J McMahon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 10.  Biomarkers to predict antidepressant response.

Authors:  Andrew F Leuchter; Ian A Cook; Steven P Hamilton; Katherine L Narr; Arthur Toga; Aimee M Hunter; Kym Faull; Julian Whitelegge; Anne M Andrews; Joseph Loo; Baldwin Way; Stanley F Nelson; Steven Horvath; Barry D Lebowitz
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.