Literature DB >> 19708769

Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures.

Najjia N Mahmoud1, Robin S Turpin, Guiping Yang, William B Saunders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Length of stay (LOS) and inpatient costs for open-abdomen colorectal procedures have not been examined recently. The aim of this study was to determine LOS and costs for several colorectal procedures in the context of factors potentially associated with surgical site infection (SSI).
METHODS: We used a large U.S. hospital database to identify the variables associated with longer LOS and higher costs for colorectal procedures from January 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. The study population consisted of all patients >18 years, identified via International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, procedural codes for elective colorectal surgery. Patient demographics, surgical procedure, and a modified Study of the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC) infection risk score were examined using logistic regression as predictors of LOS >or=1 week and cost >or=$15,000. Patients given cefotetan as surgical prophylaxis were compared with patients given cefazolin/metronidazole. Superficial and deep SSIs were considered; intra-abdominal infection was not.
RESULTS: The 25,825 patients were of average age 63 years, with 53% being female and 75% being Caucasian. The overall infection rate was 3.7%. The mean LOS was 7.25 days, and the mean +/- standard deviation total cost per patient $13,746 +/- $13,330. Rates of infection, LOS, and mean hospital costs were all greater for patients with a high SENIC score and increasing disease acuity. Values for these outcome variables were highest for procedures involving stoma formation, followed by operations on the small bowel and large bowel. Variables independently predictive of longer LOS were SSI (odds ratio [OR] 11.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.67, 14.26), age >or=65 years (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.81, 2.01), and high SENIC score (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.67, 1.92), whereas Caucasian race (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.81, 0.91) was predictive of a shorter LOS. Cefazolin/metronidazole was not predictive of a shorter LOS compared with cefotetan (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.96, 1.17) but was associated with significantly more hospitalizations with costs >or=$15,000 (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.23, 1.56).
CONCLUSIONS: Length of stay and cost rise proportionally with SENIC score, disease acuity, and patient characteristics such as age. Surgical site infections are significantly and independently associated with LOS and cost and contribute to inpatient morbidity and expense. Cefotetan has limited availability, and substitutions are utilized increasingly. Although equally efficacious in elective colon procedures, cefotetan used as surgical prophylaxis was associated with lower hospitalization costs than cefazolin plus metronidazole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19708769     DOI: 10.1089/sur.2009.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1096-2964            Impact factor:   2.150


  32 in total

1.  Operation time and body mass index are significant risk factors for surgical site infection in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Anita Kurmann; Stephan A Vorburger; Daniel Candinas; Guido Beldi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of surgical site infection after colorectal surgery on hospital stay and medical expenditure in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuichi Kashimura; Shinya Kusachi; Toshiro Konishi; Junzo Shimizu; Masato Kusunoki; Masaaki Oka; Toshiro Wakatsuki; Yoshinobu Sumiyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Dirk R Bulian; Jurgen Knuth; Kai S Lehmann; Axel Sauerwald; Markus M Heiss
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in elderly patients: Insights from the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Authors:  Umashankkar Kannan; Vemuru Sunil K Reddy; Amar N Mukerji; Vellore S Parithivel; Ajay K Shah; Brian F Gilchrist; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pharmacokinetic differences between the epimers of cefotetan disodium after single intravenous injection in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Authors:  Meng-xiang Su; Min-hong Liu; Bin Di; Li-li Huang; Yuan Jiang; Peng-cheng Ma; Tai-jun Hang
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.441

6.  Truth in Reporting: How Data Capture Methods Obfuscate Actual Surgical Site Infection Rates within a Health Care Network System.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Christy E Cauley; Donna Antonelli; Sarah Bird; David Rattner; Matthew Hutter; Sadiqa Mahmood; Deborah Schnipper; Marc Rubin; Ronald Bleday; Pardon Kenney; David Berger
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Local anesthesia: a strategy for reducing surgical site infections?

Authors:  Jay S Lee; Awori J Hayanga; James J Kubus; Henry Makepeace; Max Hutton; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Additional surgical procedure is a risk factor for surgical site infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  René Fahrner; Thomas Malinka; Jennifer Klasen; Daniel Candinas; Guido Beldi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Diagnosing Surgical Site Infection Using Wound Photography: A Scenario-Based Study.

Authors:  Patrick C Sanger; Vlad V Simianu; Cameron E Gaskill; Cheryl A L Armstrong; Andrea L Hartzler; Ross J Lordon; William B Lober; Heather L Evans
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Perioperative hyperglycemia: an unmet need within a surgical site infection bundle.

Authors:  M Gachabayov; A J Senagore; S K Abbas; S B Yelika; K You; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.