Literature DB >> 19708631

Distal femur defects reconstructed with polymethylmethacrylate and internal fixation devices: a biomechanical study.

Anthony D Uglialoro1, Michael Maceroli, Kathleen S Beebe, Joseph Benevenia, Francis R Patterson.   

Abstract

Benign aggressive distal femur tumors are treated with curettage, adjuvant phenol or argon, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) packing. For large defects, an internal fixation device is added to reduce the fracture risk. The purpose of this study is to compare the strength of locking plates to other fixation devices for stabilization of these defects. Lateral condyle defects in young, fresh frozen femurs were packed with PMMA and augmented by internal fixation. Three groups of 4 matched pairs of femurs were organized for the following comparisons: (1) stacked Steinmann pins vs crossed screws; (2) stacked pins vs locking plates; and (3) crossed screws vs locking plates. Specimens were subjected to axial load-to-failure testing on an MTS machine. There was no difference in load-to-failure strength (P=.177) using Steinmann pins or crossed screws. Locking plate constructs were stronger (P=.028) than Steinmann pin constructs. Locking plate constructs were also stronger (P<.001) than crossed-screw constructs. Steinmann pin constructs failed with severe intra-articular fractures; crossed screw constructs failed with bulging of the defects, articular impaction, and minimal fracture propagation. Locking plate constructs failed with extra-articular spiral shaft fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19708631     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090624-29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  7 in total

1.  The Most Appropriate Reconstruction Method Following Giant Cell Tumor Curettage: A Biomechanical Approach.

Authors:  Azadeh Ghouchani; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh; Gholamreza Rouhi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-03

2.  Risk factors of fracture following curettage for bone giant cell tumors of the extremities.

Authors:  Shinji Tsukamoto; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Manabu Akahane; Kanya Honoki; Akira Kido; Yasuhito Tanaka; Davide Maria Donati; Costantino Errani
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Post-operative fracture risk assessment following tumor curettage in the distal femur: a hybrid in vitro and in silico biomechanical approach.

Authors:  Azadeh Ghouchani; Gholamreza Rouhi; Mohammad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Benign Bone Tumors: An Overview of What We Know Today.

Authors:  Sara De Salvo; Vito Pavone; Sebastiano Coco; Eleonora Dell'Agli; Chiara Blatti; Gianluca Testa
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Clinical outcomes of giant cell tumor of bone treated with bone cement filling and internal fixation, and oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Xiuchun Yu; Ming Xu; Songfeng Xu; Qing Su
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Steinmann pin augmentation versus locking plate constructs.

Authors:  Jeremy Ruskin; Paolo Caravaggi; Kathleen S Beebe; Sondra Corgan; Linda Chen; Richard S Yoon; Francis R Patterson; John S Hwang
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-16

Review 7.  The Great Need of a Biomechanical-Based Approach for Surgical Methods of Giant Cell Tumor: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Azadeh Ghouchani; Gholamreza Rouhi
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 1.553

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.