Literature DB >> 19708067

An evaluation of the mode of action framework for mutagenic carcinogens case study II: chromium (VI).

Nancy McCarroll1, Nagalakshmi Keshava, Jonathan Chen, Gregory Akerman, Andrew Kligerman, Esther Rinde.   

Abstract

In response to the 2005 revised U.S Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Cancer Guidelines, a strategy is being developed to include all mutagenicity and other genotoxicity data with additional information to determine whether the initiating step in carcinogenesis is through a mutagenic mode of action (MOA). This information is necessary to decide if age-dependent adjustment factors (ADAFs) should be applied to the risk assessment. Chromium (VI) [Cr (VI)], a carcinogen in animals and humans via inhalation, was reassessed by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in 2-year drinking water studies in rodents. From these data, NTP concluded that the results with Cr (VI) showed clear evidence of carcinogenicity in male and female mice and rats. Cr (VI) is also mutagenic, in numerous in vitro assays, in animals (mice and rats) and in humans. Accordingly, Cr (VI) was processed through the MOA framework; postulated key steps in tumor formation were interaction of DNA with Cr (VI) and reduction to Cr (III), mutagenesis, cell proliferation, and tumor formation. Within the timeframe and tumorigenic dose range for early events, genetic changes in mice (single/double-stranded DNA breaks) commence within 24 hr. Mechanistic evidence was also found for oxidative damage and DNA adduct formation contributing to the tumor response. The weight of evidence supports the plausibility that Cr (VI) may act through a mutagenic MOA. Therefore, the Cancer Guidelines recommend a linear extrapolation for the oral risk assessment. Cr (VI) also induces germ cell mutagenicity and causes DNA deletions in developing embryos; thus, it is recommended that the ADAFs be applied. Published 2009 by Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19708067     DOI: 10.1002/em.20525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  19 in total

Review 1.  Chromium genotoxicity: A double-edged sword.

Authors:  Kristen P Nickens; Steven R Patierno; Susan Ceryak
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 5.192

Review 2.  Hair, serum and urine chromium levels in children with cognitive defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case control studies.

Authors:  G M Rabiul Islam; Mohammad Meshbahur Rahman; Mohammed Imrul Hasan; Amare Worku Tadesse; Jena Derakhshani Hamadani; Davidson H Hamer
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 3.  Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of rodent small intestinal tumors following oral exposure to hexavalent chromium and relevance to humans.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Mina Suh; Laurie C Haws; Christopher R Kirman; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Textile industry manufacturing by-products induce human melanoma cell proliferation via ERK1/2 activation.

Authors:  M Rizzi; B Cravello; F Renò
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  Synergistic cytotoxicity and DNA strand breaks in cells and plasmid DNA exposed to uranyl acetate and ultraviolet radiation.

Authors:  Janice Wilson; Mary C Zuniga; Filbert Yazzie; Diane M Stearns
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 6.  Application of the U.S. EPA mode of action Framework for purposes of guiding future research: a case study involving the oral carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris; Nicole M Gatto; Deborah M Proctor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Intracellular heavy metal nanoparticle storage: progressive accumulation within lymph nodes with transformation from chronic inflammation to malignancy.

Authors:  Tommaso Iannitti; Stefania Capone; Antonietta Gatti; Federico Capitani; Frederico Capitani; Francesco Cetta; Beniamino Palmieri
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-11-15

Review 8.  Chromium in drinking water: sources, metabolism, and cancer risks.

Authors:  Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Investigation of the mode of action underlying the tumorigenic response induced in B6C3F1 mice exposed orally to hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Laurie C Haws; Charles D Hébert; Sheila D Grimes; Howard G Shertzer; Anna K Kopec; J Gregory Hixon; Timothy R Zacharewski; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Assessment of Cr(VI)-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity using high content analysis.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Yuriy Fedorov; Daniel D Brown; Mina Suh; Deborah M Proctor; Liz Kuriakose; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.