Literature DB >> 19707896

Cesarean section rates among health professionals in Finland, 1990-2006.

Elina Hemminki1, Reija Klemetti, Mika Gissler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this paper is to establish whether health professionals in Finland have cesarean sections more or less often than other women of a similar educational background. DESIGN. Register-based study (Finnish birth register). SETTING. Finland 1990-2006. POPULATION. Singleton births, for midwives (3,009 births), nurses (101,199), and physicians (7,642). Teachers (n=23,454) were chosen as controls for midwives and nurses, and other white collar workers (n=124,606) were chosen as controls for physicians. METHODS. Cesarean section rates were studied for all births and for first births only. The odds ratios for mode of delivery were calculated using logistic regression, adjusting for age, parity, marital status and smoking, and in an additional analysis, also adjusting for post-term birth and birth weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES. Mode of delivery. RESULTS. During the time period studied, the overall cesarean section rate in Finland was 15%. The studied groups had similar rates of cesarean section. When adjusting for background characteristics, midwives and nurses had marginally lower cesarean section rates than teachers, and physicians had lower rates than other white collar workers. In the case of first births, similar differences were found. Instrumental deliveries were somewhat lower among midwives as compared to teachers, and among physicians as compared to other white collar workers. CONCLUSIONS. Our results suggest that Finnish physicians may prefer vaginal delivery and have relatively conservative opinions about cesarean sections. This may be an important explanation of the relatively low, compared to international rates, and stable cesarean section rates in Finland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19707896     DOI: 10.1080/00016340903214957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  Social predictors of caesarean section births in Italy.

Authors:  Mastaki J Kambale
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Patterns of deliveries in a Brazilian birth cohort: almost universal cesarean sections for the better-off.

Authors:  Aluísio J D Barros; Iná S Santos; Alicia Matijasevich; Marlos Rodrigues Domingues; Mariângela Silveira; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.106

3.  Development of strategies to reduce cesarean delivery rates in iran 2012-2014: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Razieh Lotfi; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Marzieh Rostami Dovom; Farahnaz Torkestani; Mehrandokht Abedini; Sima Sajedinejad
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-12

4.  Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences?

Authors:  Wei Deng; Reija Klemetti; Qian Long; Zhuochun Wu; Chenggang Duan; Wei-Hong Zhang; Carine Ronsmans; Yu Zhang; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Effects of Recruiting Midwives into a Family Physician Program on Women's Awareness and Preference for Mode of Delivery and Caesarean Section Rates in Rural Areas of Kurdistan.

Authors:  Shayesteh Hajizadeh; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani; Masoumeh Simbar; Farshad Farzadfar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Najmeh Maharlouei; Abbas Rezaianzadeh; Elham Hesami; Fariba Moradi; Ezat Mazloomi; Hassan Joulaei; Mohammad Khodayari; Kamran B Lankarani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.852

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.