PURPOSE: The retrospective study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity profiles of sunitinib in Korean patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2008, 76 Korean patients with recurrent/metastatic RCC who received sunitinib were retrospectively reviewed. The primary end point was progression-free survival and the secondary end points were overall survival and response rate. We also assessed the toxicities associated with sunitinib treatment. RESULTS: Of the 76 patients, 69 (90.1%) were diagnosed with clear cell RCC. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.2 and 22.8 months, respectively in overall patients. Sixty-two patients (81.6%) received 50 mg 4 week and 2 week off schedule, and 14 patients (18.4%) received 37.5 mg daily on a daily continuous schedule. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 27.6% and 84.2%, respectively. A dose reduction or reduction in dose due to adverse events occurred in 76% of the patients, whereas 11% of the patients had discontinued treatment. Other common laboratory abnormalities were increased serum creatinine (75.6%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (71.0%), neutropenia (61.8%), anemia (69.7%), and increased aspartate aminotrasferase (53.3%). Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred as follows: thrombocytopenia (38.2%), fatigue (10.5%), stomatitis (10.5%), and hand-foot syndrome (9.2%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that sunitinib treatment is effective and tolerable for ecurrent/metastatic RCC patients in Korea. Further studies with prognostic or biochemical factors are needed to clarify the different toxicity profiles of this study.
PURPOSE: The retrospective study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity profiles of sunitinib in Korean patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and December 2008, 76 Korean patients with recurrent/metastatic RCC who received sunitinib were retrospectively reviewed. The primary end point was progression-free survival and the secondary end points were overall survival and response rate. We also assessed the toxicities associated with sunitinib treatment. RESULTS: Of the 76 patients, 69 (90.1%) were diagnosed with clear cell RCC. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7.2 and 22.8 months, respectively in overall patients. Sixty-two patients (81.6%) received 50 mg 4 week and 2 week off schedule, and 14 patients (18.4%) received 37.5 mg daily on a daily continuous schedule. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 27.6% and 84.2%, respectively. A dose reduction or reduction in dose due to adverse events occurred in 76% of the patients, whereas 11% of the patients had discontinued treatment. Other common laboratory abnormalities were increased serum creatinine (75.6%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (71.0%), neutropenia (61.8%), anemia (69.7%), and increased aspartate aminotrasferase (53.3%). Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred as follows: thrombocytopenia (38.2%), fatigue (10.5%), stomatitis (10.5%), and hand-foot syndrome (9.2%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that sunitinib treatment is effective and tolerable for ecurrent/metastatic RCCpatients in Korea. Further studies with prognostic or biochemical factors are needed to clarify the different toxicity profiles of this study.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; Piotr Tomczak; M Dror Michaelson; Ronald M Bukowski; Olivier Rixe; Stéphane Oudard; Sylvie Negrier; Cezary Szczylik; Sindy T Kim; Isan Chen; Paul W Bycott; Charles M Baum; Robert A Figlin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Jennifer Bacik; Lawrence H Schwartz; Victor Reuter; Paul Russo; Stephanie Marion; Madhu Mazumdar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ying Chen; Akiyuki Suzuki; Michael A Tortorici; May Garrett; Robert R LaBadie; Yoshiko Umeyama; Yazdi K Pithavala Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2015-02-08 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Eduard Vrdoljak; Lajos Géczi; Jozef Mardiak; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Sophie Leyman; Ke Zhang; Peter Sajben; Laszlo Torday Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2015-01-04 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Sang Hyun Yoon; Ki Hyang Kim; Junjeong Choi; Gun Min Kim; Joo Hoon Kim; Hyo Song Kim; Young Nyun Park; Sun Young Rha Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 4.679
Authors: R J Motzer; B Escudier; R Bukowski; B I Rini; T E Hutson; C H Barrios; X Lin; K Fly; E Matczak; M E Gore Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Y Wang; T K Choueiri; J-L Lee; M-H Tan; S Y Rha; S A North; C K Kollmannsberger; D F McDermott; D Y C Heng Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 7.640