| Literature DB >> 19707277 |
Mohamad Rasm Al Sibae1, Brendan M McGuire.
Abstract
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common reversible neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with chronic and acute liver dysfunction and significant morbidity and mortality. Although a clear pathogenesis is yet to be determined, elevated ammonia in the serum and central nervous system are the mainstay for pathogenesis and treatment. Management includes early diagnosis and prompt treatment of precipitating factors (infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, electrolyte disturbances, hepatocellular carcinoma, dehydration, hypotension, and use of benzodiazepines, psychoactive drugs, and/or alcohol). Clinical trials have established the efficacy of lactulose and lactitol enemas in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy. Extensive clinical experience has demonstrated the efficacy of oral lactulose and lactitol with the goal of two to three soft bowel movements a day for the treatment of chronic HE. However, lactulose and lactitol have significant gastrointestinal side effects. For patients unable to tolerate lactulose or lactitol or who still have persistent chronic HE with lactulose or lactitol, neomycin, metronidazole and rifaximin are second-line agents. More recent data supports the benefits of rifaximin used solely and as an additional agent with fewer side effects than neomycin or metronidazole. Newer therapies being investigated in humans with clinical promise include nitazoxanide, the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), L-ornithine phenylacetate, sodium benzoate, and/or sodium phenylacetate and Kremezin((R)) (AST-120).Entities:
Keywords: hepatic encephalopathy; lactitol; lactulose; liver dysfunction
Year: 2009 PMID: 19707277 PMCID: PMC2724191 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s4443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Clin Risk Manag ISSN: 1176-6336 Impact factor: 2.423
West Haven criteria for altered mental status in hepatic encephalopathy
| Minimal changes in memory and lack of detectable changes in personality or behavior. No asterixis. |
| Trivial lack of awareness, shortened attention span, sleep disturbance, altered mood, and slowing the ability to perform mental tasks. Asterixis can be detected. |
| Lethargy or apathy, disorientation to time, amnesia of recent events, impaired simple computations, inappropriate behavior, slurred speech. Asterixis is present. |
| Somnolence, confusion, disorientation to place, bizarre behavior, clonus, nystagmus, and positive Babinski sign. Asterixis usually absent. |
| Coma with or without response to painful stimuli. |
Common precipitants of hepatic encephalopathy and the underlying mechanisms
Increased nitrogen load
Excess dietary protein Constipation Gastrointestinal bleeding Blood transfusions Azotemia Infection Hypokalemia Decrease toxins clearance
Dehydration
Fluid restriction Excessive diuresis Abdominal paracentesis Diarrhea due to laxatives Hypotension
Bleeding Systemic vasodilatation Anemia Porto systemic shunts (iatrogenic and spontaneous) Altered neurotransmission
Benzodiazepines Psychoactive drugs Hepatocellular damage
Continued alcohol abuse Development of hepatocellular carcinoma |
Treatment summary
| Acute HE – enemas: 300 ml in 1000 ml every two hours until clinical improvement. |
| Acute HE – oral: 45 ml each hour until bowel movement and clinical improvement. |
| Chronic HE – oral: 15–45 ml tid or bid continuous until two to three bowel movements per day. |
| Chronic HE – oral: 400–550 mg po bid |
| Acute HE – oral: 1 g every six hours for up to six days |
| Chronic HE – oral: 1–2 g/day |
| Chronic HE – oral: 250 mg bid |
| Chronic HE – oral: titrate up to clinical improvement or a maximum dose of 5 g bid |
| Chronic HE – oral: 11 mg in adult males and 8 mg in adult females every day |
| Chronic HE – oral: 30 mg bid |
| Chronic HE – surgical obliteration of large spontaneous portosystemic anatomoses, splenic artery embolization, or total colectomy. |
| The US Preventive Services Task Force evidence ranking |
Level I: evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomized controlled trial. Level II-1: evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trials without randomization. Level II-2: evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies, preferably from more than one center or research group. Level II-3: evidence obtained from multiple time series with or without the intervention. Dramatic results in uncontrolled trials might also be regarded as this type of evidence. Level III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees. |