Literature DB >> 19706879

Can female adolescents tell whether they will test positive for Chlamydia infection?

Wändi Bruine de Bruin1, Julie S Downs, Pamela Murray, Baruch Fischhoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Having better predictors of chlamydia infection may improve health care providers' decisions about when to provide testing for Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct). Adolescents' probability judgments of significant life events in the next year and by age 20 y have shown promising validity, being significantly correlated with subsequent self-reports of having experienced these events. Here, the authors examine whether female adolescents' probability judgments of having chlamydia were correlated with the objective outcome of a Ct polymerase chain reaction assay.
METHODS: Three hundred sexually active female adolescents were recruited from urban health care clinics in Pittsburgh. They assessed ''the percent chance that you have chlamydia right now,'' then answered questions about their demographic background and sexual history. Subsequently, the authors tested for Ct infection using a self-administered introital swab.
RESULTS: Adolescents' probability judgments of having chlamydia ''right now'' were correlated with whether they tested positive for Ct infection, even after controlling for demographic variables and sexual history. This result held when probability judgments were dichotomized in terms of whether adolescents had assigned a zero or nonzero probability. Adolescents' mean probability judgment was less than their infection rate, indicating that, on average, they underestimated their actual risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents can tell whether they are at increased risk for chlamydia but may need better information about its absolute magnitude. Eliciting adolescents' probability judgments of having chlamydia can add value to clinical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19706879     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09343308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  5 in total

1.  Theoretically motivated interventions for reducing sexual risk taking in adolescence: a randomized controlled experiment applying fuzzy-trace theory.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Britain A Mills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-04-28

2.  Mode Effects in Assessing Cancer Worry and Risk Perceptions: Is Social Desirability Bias at Play?

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Bryan Leyva; Rebecca A Ferrer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Assessing small non-zero perceptions of chance: The case of H1N1 (swine) flu risks.

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Andrew M Parker; Jürgen Maurer
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2011-04

4.  Measuring risk perceptions: what does the excessive use of 50% mean?

Authors:  Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Katherine G Carman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Human social sensing is an untapped resource for computational social science.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Jonas Dalege; Scott L Feld; Frauke Kreuter; Henrik Olsson; Drazen Prelec; Daniel L Stein; Tamara van der Does
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.