PURPOSE: microRNAs have been shown to be involved in different human cancers. We therefore have performed expression profiles on a panel of pediatric tumors to identify cancer-specific microRNAs. We also investigated if microRNAs are coregulated with their host gene. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed parallel microRNAs and mRNA expression profiling on 57 tumor xenografts and cell lines representing 10 different pediatric solid tumors using microarrays. For those microRNAs that map to their host mRNA, we calculated correlations between them. RESULTS: We found that the majority of cancer types clustered together based on their global microRNA expression profiles by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Fourteen microRNAs were significantly differentially expressed between rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma, and 8 of them were validated in independent patient tumor samples. Exploration of the expression of microRNAs in relationship with their host genes showed that the expression for 43 of 68 (63%) microRNAs located inside known coding genes was significantly correlated with that of their host genes. Among these 43 microRNAs, 5 of 7 microRNAs in the OncomiR-1 cluster correlated significantly with their host gene MIRHG1 (P < 0.01). In addition, high expression of MIRHG1 was significantly associated with high stage and MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma tumors, and the expression level of MIRHG1 could predict the outcome of neuroblastoma patients independently from the current neuroblastoma risk-stratification in two independent patient cohorts. CONCLUSION: Pediatric cancers express cancer-specific microRNAs. The high expression of the OncomiR-1 host gene MIRHG1 correlates with poor outcome for patients with neuroblastoma, indicating important oncogenic functions of this microRNA cluster in neuroblastoma biology.
PURPOSE: microRNAs have been shown to be involved in different humancancers. We therefore have performed expression profiles on a panel of pediatric tumors to identify cancer-specific microRNAs. We also investigated if microRNAs are coregulated with their host gene. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed parallel microRNAs and mRNA expression profiling on 57 tumor xenografts and cell lines representing 10 different pediatric solid tumors using microarrays. For those microRNAs that map to their host mRNA, we calculated correlations between them. RESULTS: We found that the majority of cancer types clustered together based on their global microRNA expression profiles by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. Fourteen microRNAs were significantly differentially expressed between rhabdomyosarcoma and neuroblastoma, and 8 of them were validated in independent patienttumor samples. Exploration of the expression of microRNAs in relationship with their host genes showed that the expression for 43 of 68 (63%) microRNAs located inside known coding genes was significantly correlated with that of their host genes. Among these 43 microRNAs, 5 of 7 microRNAs in the OncomiR-1 cluster correlated significantly with their host gene MIRHG1 (P < 0.01). In addition, high expression of MIRHG1 was significantly associated with high stage and MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma tumors, and the expression level of MIRHG1 could predict the outcome of neuroblastomapatients independently from the current neuroblastoma risk-stratification in two independent patient cohorts. CONCLUSION:Pediatric cancers express cancer-specific microRNAs. The high expression of the OncomiR-1 host gene MIRHG1 correlates with poor outcome for patients with neuroblastoma, indicating important oncogenic functions of this microRNA cluster in neuroblastoma biology.
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Don A Baldwin; L Marie Scearce; J Carl Oberholtzer; John W Tobias; Zissimos Mourelatos Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Alexei L Krasnoselsky; Craig C Whiteford; Jun S Wei; Sven Bilke; Frank Westermann; Qing-Rong Chen; Javed Khan Journal: Oncogene Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Lee P Lim; Nelson C Lau; Philip Garrett-Engele; Andrew Grimson; Janell M Schelter; John Castle; David P Bartel; Peter S Linsley; Jason M Johnson Journal: Nature Date: 2005-01-30 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lin He; J Michael Thomson; Michael T Hemann; Eva Hernando-Monge; David Mu; Summer Goodson; Scott Powers; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Scott W Lowe; Gregory J Hannon; Scott M Hammond Journal: Nature Date: 2005-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jun Lu; Gad Getz; Eric A Miska; Ezequiel Alvarez-Saavedra; Justin Lamb; David Peck; Alejandro Sweet-Cordero; Benjamin L Ebert; Raymond H Mak; Adolfo A Ferrando; James R Downing; Tyler Jacks; H Robert Horvitz; Todd R Golub Journal: Nature Date: 2005-06-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jennifer L Reichek; Fenghai Duan; Lynette M Smith; Donna M Gustafson; Roddy S O'Connor; Chune Zhang; Mandy J Dunlevy; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Frederic G Barr Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Isabella Bray; Kenneth Bryan; Suzanne Prenter; Patrick G Buckley; Niamh H Foley; Derek M Murphy; Leah Alcock; Pieter Mestdagh; Jo Vandesompele; Frank Speleman; Wendy B London; Patrick W McGrady; Desmond G Higgins; Anne O'Meara; Maureen O'Sullivan; Raymond L Stallings Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 3.240