Andrea S Fung1, Licun Wu, Ian F Tannock. 1. Division of Applied Molecular Oncology and Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Optimal scheduling of cycle-active chemotherapy with (initially cytostatic) molecular-targeted agents is important to maximize clinical benefit. Concurrent scheduling might allow up-regulation of cell death pathways at the time of chemotherapy, whereas sequential treatments might maximize inhibition of repopulation and avoid putting tumor cells out of cycle when administering cycle-active chemotherapy. We compared the effects of concurrent and sequential administration of chemotherapy and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus (CCI-779) on tumor cells and xenografts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Human prostate cancer PC-3 and LnCaP, and human breast cancer MDA-468 cells and xenografts were treated with chemotherapy (docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil, respectively) and temsirolimus, using concurrent and sequential treatment schedules. Cell killing and repopulation were evaluated by clonogenic assays. Cell cycle analysis was done using flow cytometry. Effects on xenografts were assessed by tumor growth delay. RESULTS: The proliferation of all cell lines was inhibited by temsirolimus in a dose-dependent manner; PTEN negative PC-3 and mutant LnCaP cells were more sensitive than PTEN-negative MDA-468 cells. Temsirolimus inhibited cell cycle progression from G(1) to S phase in all cell lines. Combined treatment had greater effects than temsirolimus or chemotherapy alone: for PC-3 and LnCaP xenografts, concurrent treatment seemed superior to sequential scheduling, whereas MDA-468 cells and xenograft tumors did not show schedule dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with temsirolimus and chemotherapy had a greater therapeutic effect than monotherapy; concurrent scheduling was more effective for PC-3 and LnCaP cells and xenografts that were sensitive to temsirolimus.
PURPOSE: Optimal scheduling of cycle-active chemotherapy with (initially cytostatic) molecular-targeted agents is important to maximize clinical benefit. Concurrent scheduling might allow up-regulation of cell death pathways at the time of chemotherapy, whereas sequential treatments might maximize inhibition of repopulation and avoid putting tumor cells out of cycle when administering cycle-active chemotherapy. We compared the effects of concurrent and sequential administration of chemotherapy and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus (CCI-779) on tumor cells and xenografts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Humanprostate cancerPC-3 and LnCaP, and humanbreast cancer MDA-468 cells and xenografts were treated with chemotherapy (docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil, respectively) and temsirolimus, using concurrent and sequential treatment schedules. Cell killing and repopulation were evaluated by clonogenic assays. Cell cycle analysis was done using flow cytometry. Effects on xenografts were assessed by tumor growth delay. RESULTS: The proliferation of all cell lines was inhibited by temsirolimus in a dose-dependent manner; PTEN negative PC-3 and mutant LnCaP cells were more sensitive than PTEN-negative MDA-468 cells. Temsirolimus inhibited cell cycle progression from G(1) to S phase in all cell lines. Combined treatment had greater effects than temsirolimus or chemotherapy alone: for PC-3 and LnCaP xenografts, concurrent treatment seemed superior to sequential scheduling, whereas MDA-468 cells and xenograft tumors did not show schedule dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with temsirolimus and chemotherapy had a greater therapeutic effect than monotherapy; concurrent scheduling was more effective for PC-3 and LnCaP cells and xenografts that were sensitive to temsirolimus.
Authors: Christine K Cheng; W Clay Gustafson; Elizabeth Charron; Benjamin T Houseman; Eli Zunder; Andrei Goga; Nathanael S Gray; Brian Pollok; Scott A Oakes; C David James; Kevan M Shokat; William A Weiss; Qi-Wen Fan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hongyan Wang; Chunpeng Zhang; Anna Rorick; Dayong Wu; Ming Chiu; Jennifer Thomas-Ahner; Zhong Chen; Hongyan Chen; Steven K Clinton; Kenneth K Chan; Qianben Wang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Robert J Amato; George Wilding; Glenn Bubley; John Loewy; Frank Haluska; Mitchell E Gross Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Oliver Ou; Konrad Huppi; Sirisha Chakka; Kristen Gehlhaus; Wendy Dubois; Jyoti Patel; Jinqiu Chen; Mark Mackiewicz; Tamara L Jones; Jason J Pitt; Scott E Martin; Paul Goldsmith; John K Simmons; Beverly A Mock; Natasha J Caplen Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Elizabeth G Graham-Gurysh; Ananya B Murthy; Kathryn M Moore; Shawn D Hingtgen; Eric M Bachelder; Kristy M Ainslie Journal: J Control Release Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 9.776