Literature DB >> 19706788

Differential efficacy of SSTR1, -2, and -5 agonists in the inhibition of C6 glioma growth in nude mice.

Federica Barbieri1, Alessandra Pattarozzi, Monica Gatti, Cinzia Aiello, Ana Quintero, Gianluigi Lunardi, Adriana Bajetto, Angelo Ferrari, Michael D Culler, Tullio Florio.   

Abstract

Somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5) mediate antiproliferative effects. In C6 rat glioma cells, somatostatin is cytostatic in vitro via phosphotyrosine phosphatase-dependent inhibition of ERK1/2 activity mediated by SSTR1, -2, and -5. Here we analyzed the effects of SSTR activation on C6 glioma growth in vivo and the intracellular mechanisms involved, comparing somatostatin effects with selective agonists for SSTR1, -2, and -5 (BIM-23745, BIM-23120, BIM-23206) or receptor biselective compounds (SSTR1 and -2, BIM-23704; and SSTR2 and -5, BIM-23190). Nude mice subcutaneously xenografted with C6 cells were treated with somatostatin, SSTR agonists (50 μg, twice/day), or vehicle. Tumor growth was evaluated every 3 days for 19 days. The intracellular pathways responsible of SSTR effects in vivo were evaluated measuring Ki-67, phospho-ERK1/2, and p27(kip1) expression by immunohistochemistry in sections from explanted tumors. Somatostatin and SSTR1, -2, and -5 agonists strongly inhibited in vivo C6 tumor growth, intratumoral neovessel formation, Ki-67 expression, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and induced upregulation of p27(Kip1), whereas only a modest activation of caspase-3 was observed. Somatostatin (acting on SSTR1, -2, and -5) displayed the highest efficacy; SSTR5 selective agonist showed a stronger effect than SSTR1 agonist, and SSTR2 agonist was less effective. On the other hand, SSTR1 and -2 agonists maximally reduced tumor neovascularization. The combined activation of SSTR1 and -2 showed a synergistic activity, reaching a higher efficacy than BIM-23206, whereas the simultaneous activation of SSTR2 and -5 resulted in a response resembling SSTR5 effects. Thus the simultaneous activation of different SSTRs inhibits glioma cell proliferation in vivo through both direct cytotostatic and antiangiogenic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19706788     DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00292.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0193-1849            Impact factor:   4.310


  12 in total

Review 1.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature.

Authors:  Thomas Günther; Giovanni Tulipano; Pascal Dournaud; Corinne Bousquet; Zsolt Csaba; Hans-Jürgen Kreienkamp; Amelie Lupp; Márta Korbonits; Justo P Castaño; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Michael Culler; Shlomo Melmed; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Antiproliferative effect of somatostatin analogs in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Jonathan Strosberg; Larry Kvols
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Transcriptional profiling provides insights into metronomic cyclophosphamide-activated, innate immune-dependent regression of brain tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Joshua C Doloff; David J Waxman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Somatostatin receptor expression on von Hippel-Lindau-associated hemangioblastomas offers novel therapeutic target.

Authors:  Saman Sizdahkhani; Michael J Feldman; Martin G Piazza; Alexander Ksendzovsky; Nancy A Edwards; Abhik Ray-Chaudhury; Dragan Maric; Marsha J Merrill; Karel Pacak; Zhengping Zhuang; Prashant Chittiboina
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Development of an Injectable Slow-Release Metformin Formulation and Evaluation of Its Potential Antitumor Effects.

Authors:  Sara Baldassari; Agnese Solari; Guendalina Zuccari; Giuliana Drava; Sara Pastorino; Carmen Fucile; Valeria Marini; Antonio Daga; Alessandra Pattarozzi; Alessandra Ratto; Angelo Ferrari; Francesca Mattioli; Federica Barbieri; Gabriele Caviglioli; Tullio Florio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Biological and Biochemical Basis of the Differential Efficacy of First and Second Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Federico Gatto; Federica Barbieri; Marica Arvigo; Stefano Thellung; Jessica Amarù; Manuela Albertelli; Diego Ferone; Tullio Florio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Peptide receptor targeting in cancer: the somatostatin paradigm.

Authors:  Federica Barbieri; Adriana Bajetto; Alessandra Pattarozzi; Monica Gatti; Roberto Würth; Stefano Thellung; Alessandro Corsaro; Valentina Villa; Mario Nizzari; Tullio Florio
Journal:  Int J Pept       Date:  2013-02-07

Review 8.  New molecules and old drugs as emerging approaches to selectively target human glioblastoma cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Roberto Würth; Federica Barbieri; Tullio Florio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  PI3K-AKT-mTOR-signaling and beyond: the complex network in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Franziska Briest; Patricia Grabowski
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Loss of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 in prostate cancer is linked to an aggressive cancer phenotype, high tumor cell proliferation and predicts early metastatic and biochemical relapse.

Authors:  Jan K Hennigs; Julia Müller; Matti Adam; Joshua M Spin; Emilia Riedel; Markus Graefen; Carsten Bokemeyer; Guido Sauter; Hartwig Huland; Thorsten Schlomm; Sarah Minner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.