Patient privacy versus protecting the patient and the health system from harm: a case study.

A 71-year-old man who presented to hospital with chest pain and a history of cardiovascular disease was repeatedly hospitalised over the course of a month for care that included multiple investigations, intensive care, transfer to and from a metropolitan hospital, discharge, and readmissions for collapse, hemiparesis, and vision change. The medical team excluded underlying disease related to his initial chest pain and subsequent neurological symptoms. A search for (undisclosed) prior hospitalisations revealed multiple previous admissions and invasive investigations at hospitals across Australia, resulting in a diagnosis of Munchausen syndrome. Assuming that, despite interventions, patients with Munchausen syndrome or somatoform disorders often continue to seek care at other hospitals, we discuss the implications of this patient's behaviour for the health care system, society, and the risk to his own health. In our view, this case highlights conflicts between privacy legislation and doctors' mandates to protect the patient from harm, as well as their duty to attend to the financial viability of health services by communicating with other potential health care providers. The health care system and similar patients may benefit from efforts to educate doctors about this spectrum of disorders and from considering the implementation of a highly confidential, structured notification system.