Literature DB >> 19705936

Computational formulation of orthodontic tooth-extraction decisions. Part I: to extract or not to extract.

Kenji Takada1, Masakazu Yagi, Eriko Horiguchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a mathematical model that simulates whether or not to extract teeth in optimizing orthodontic treatment outcome and to formulate the morphologic traits sensitive to optimizing the tooth-extraction/nonextraction decisions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 188 conventional orthodontic records of patients with good treatment outcomes were collected, and dentofacial morphologic traits, along with their degrees of influence in the optimized model, were determined.
RESULTS: The rate of coincidence between the recommendations given by the optimized model and the actual treatments performed was found to be 90.4%. The major morphologic traits and their corresponding influences in improving the simulation accuracy of the model were the incisor overjet (3.0) and the size of the basal arch relative to the sum of the mesiodistal crown diameters of the upper dentition (2.4) and the lower dentition (2.0). The remaining 22 morphologic-trait variables were also found to be indispensable in achieving robust simulation readings.
CONCLUSION: A mathematical model that simulates whether or not to extract teeth in optimizing orthodontic treatment outcomes with a success rate of 90.4% at its prediction performance was developed. This model has 25 morphologic traits with four major categories (sagittal dentoskeletal and soft tissue relationship, vertical dentoskeletal relationship, transverse dental relationship, and intra-arch conditions) that affected the accuracy in determining optimal tooth extractions/nonextractions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19705936     DOI: 10.2319/081908-436.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of artificial intelligence for tooth extraction decision-making in orthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karine Evangelista; Brunno Santos de Freitas Silva; Fernanda Paula Yamamoto-Silva; José Valladares-Neto; Maria Alves Garcia Silva; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; Graziela de Luca Canto; Carla Massignan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Influence of the Depth of the Convolutional Neural Networks on an Artificial Intelligence Model for Diagnosis of Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Ye-Hyun Kim; Jae-Bong Park; Min-Seok Chang; Jae-Jun Ryu; Won Hee Lim; Seok-Ki Jung
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-29

3.  Orthodontic Treatment Planning based on Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  Peilin Li; Deyu Kong; Tian Tang; Di Su; Pu Yang; Huixia Wang; Zhihe Zhao; Yang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Use of automated artificial intelligence to predict the need for orthodontic extractions.

Authors:  Alberto Del Real; Octavio Del Real; Sebastian Sardina; Rodrigo Oyonarte
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 5.  Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review.

Authors:  Yashodhan M Bichu; Ismaeel Hansa; Aditi Y Bichu; Pratik Premjani; Carlos Flores-Mir; Nikhilesh R Vaid
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.