BACKGROUND: : It long has been recognized that married patients have improved cancer survival when compared with unmarried patients. This has been postulated as being due to increased support, potentially leading to better compliance with therapy. Conversely, some data exist pointing to a relationship between marital discord and decreased immunity. We examined whether unmarried patients have a different prognosis by whether they are 1) never married, 2) divorced, 3) widowed, or 4) separated at time of diagnosis. METHODS: : The public access data of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry were queried for cancer survival across all 17 registries between 1973 and 2004. SEER last updated data in April 2007. Records of 3.79 million patients were included in the analysis. We specifically analyzed 5-year and 10-year relative survival (RS; 5yRS, 10yRS), defined as observed survival divided by observed survival of an age-matched, race-matched, and gender-matched population without disease, for all cancer patients by marital status, with specific subset analyses as indicated. RESULTS: : Among unmarried patients, those separated at time of diagnosis had the lowest survival, followed by widowed, divorced, and never married patients. 5-year and 10-year RS of separated patients was 72% and 64% than that of married patients, respectively. This relationship persists when data are analyzed by gender. CONCLUSIONS: : Separated marital status is associated with a significant decrement in cancer survival, even in comparison with other unmarried groups. While other socioeconomic variables could contribute to this phenomenon, further research into the immunologic correlates of the acutely stressful condition of marital separation should be conducted. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: : It long has been recognized that married patients have improved cancer survival when compared with unmarried patients. This has been postulated as being due to increased support, potentially leading to better compliance with therapy. Conversely, some data exist pointing to a relationship between marital discord and decreased immunity. We examined whether unmarried patients have a different prognosis by whether they are 1) never married, 2) divorced, 3) widowed, or 4) separated at time of diagnosis. METHODS: : The public access data of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry were queried for cancer survival across all 17 registries between 1973 and 2004. SEER last updated data in April 2007. Records of 3.79 million patients were included in the analysis. We specifically analyzed 5-year and 10-year relative survival (RS; 5yRS, 10yRS), defined as observed survival divided by observed survival of an age-matched, race-matched, and gender-matched population without disease, for all cancerpatients by marital status, with specific subset analyses as indicated. RESULTS: : Among unmarried patients, those separated at time of diagnosis had the lowest survival, followed by widowed, divorced, and never married patients. 5-year and 10-year RS of separated patients was 72% and 64% than that of married patients, respectively. This relationship persists when data are analyzed by gender. CONCLUSIONS: : Separated marital status is associated with a significant decrement in cancer survival, even in comparison with other unmarried groups. While other socioeconomic variables could contribute to this phenomenon, further research into the immunologic correlates of the acutely stressful condition of marital separation should be conducted. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Richard J Davidson; Jon Kabat-Zinn; Jessica Schumacher; Melissa Rosenkranz; Daniel Muller; Saki F Santorelli; Ferris Urbanowski; Anne Harrington; Katherine Bonus; John F Sheridan Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Barbara L Andersen; Hae-Chung Yang; William B Farrar; Deanna M Golden-Kreutz; Charles F Emery; Lisa M Thornton; Donn C Young; William E Carson Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kevin Lee Du; Kyounghwa Bae; Benjamin Movsas; Yan Yan; Charlene Bryan; Deborah Watkins Bruner Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Susan K Lutgendorf; Koen De Geest; David Bender; Amina Ahmed; Michael J Goodheart; Laila Dahmoush; M Bridget Zimmerman; Frank J Penedo; Joseph A Lucci; Parvin Ganjei-Azar; Premal H Thaker; Luis Mendez; David M Lubaroff; George M Slavich; Steven W Cole; Anil K Sood Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marilyn L Kwan; Isaac Joshua Ergas; Carol P Somkin; Charles P Quesenberry; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Michael P Pelayo; Allegra W Timperi; Sunita Q Miles; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: J Scott Magnuson; Jennifer Durst; Eben L Rosenthal; William R Carroll; Christine S Ritchie; Meredith L Kilgore; Julie L Locher Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-04-14 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Lisa M Jaremka; Ronald Glaser; William B Malarkey; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2013-07-20 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Adam Pearson; Jon Lurie; Tor Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; William Abdu; Sohail Mirza; James Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2012-01-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Susan K Lutgendorf; Koen DeGeest; Laila Dahmoush; Donna Farley; Frank Penedo; David Bender; Michael Goodheart; Thomas E Buekers; Luis Mendez; Gina Krueger; Lauren Clevenger; David M Lubaroff; Anil K Sood; Steve W Cole Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2010-10-16 Impact factor: 7.217