Literature DB >> 19704500

Gall insects and indirect plant defenses: A case of active manipulation?

John F Tooker1, Consuelo M De Moraes.   

Abstract

Many plants can defend themselves against insect herbivory by attracting natural enemies that kill feeding herbivores and limit the damage they inflict. Such "indirect defenses" can be induced by insects feeding on different plant tissues and using a variety of feeding styles. However, we have recently shown that gall-inducing insect species can avoid the indirect defenses of their host plant species and even alter volatile emissions following subsequent herbivory. One of the species we studied, Eurosta solidaginis, induces galls on goldenrod (Solidago altissima) and appears to exert a unique influence over the indirect defenses of its host plant that is not readily explained by levels of defense-related phytohormones, gall formation or resource depletion. Our evidence suggests that this gall-insect species may be able to manipulate its host plant species to avoid and/or modify its defensive responses. The results also provide insight into gall induction because the gall-insect species that we screened did not increase levels of jasmonic acid, which, in addition to triggering volatile emissions, is a powerful growth regulator that could prevent the cell growth and division that leads to gall formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eurosta; Gnorimoschema; Solidago altissima; gall; herbivory; induced responses; jasmonic acid; volatile response

Year:  2008        PMID: 19704500      PMCID: PMC2634444          DOI: 10.4161/psb.3.7.6184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


  8 in total

1.  Manipulation of the phenolic chemistry of willows by gall-inducing sawflies.

Authors:  T Nyman; R Julkunen-Tiitto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions.

Authors:  Martin Heil
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Relative importance of semiochemicals from first and second trophic levels in host foraging behavior ofAphidius ervi.

Authors:  Y J Du; G M Poppy; W Powell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots.

Authors:  Sergio Rasmann; Tobias G Köllner; Jörg Degenhardt; Ivan Hiltpold; Stefan Toepfer; Ulrich Kuhlmann; Jonathan Gershenzon; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Altered host plant volatiles are proxies for sex pheromones in the gall wasp Antistrophus rufus.

Authors:  John F Tooker; Wilfried A Koenig; Lawrence M Hanks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps.

Authors:  T C Turlings; J H Tumlinson; W J Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Stereochemistry of host plant monoterpenes as mate location cues for the gall wasp Antistrophus rufus.

Authors:  John F Tooker; Lawrence M Hanks
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Induction of plant volatiles by herbivores with different feeding habits and the effects of induced defenses on host-plant selection by thrips.

Authors:  Casey M Delphia; Mark C Mescher; Consuelo M De Moraes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 2.793

  8 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Phytohormone dynamics associated with gall insects, and their potential role in the evolution of the gall-inducing habit.

Authors:  John F Tooker; Anjel M Helms
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Eavesdropping on gall-plant interactions: the importance of the signaling function of induced volatiles.

Authors:  Gudryan J Barônio; Denis Coelho Oliveira
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2019-09-20

3.  Leaf-galling phylloxera on grapes reprograms host metabolism and morphology.

Authors:  Paul D Nabity; Miranda J Haus; May R Berenbaum; Evan H DeLucia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Gall volatiles defend aphids against a browsing mammal.

Authors:  Michael Rostás; Daniel Maag; Makihiko Ikegami; Moshe Inbar
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Responsiveness of cats (Felidae) to silver vine (Actinidia polygama), Tatarian honeysuckle (Lonicera tatarica), valerian (Valeriana officinalis) and catnip (Nepeta cataria).

Authors:  Sebastiaan Bol; Jana Caspers; Lauren Buckingham; Gail Denise Anderson-Shelton; Carrie Ridgway; C A Tony Buffington; Stefan Schulz; Evelien M Bunnik
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Oak gall wasp infections of Quercus robur leaves lead to profound modifications in foliage photosynthetic and volatile emission characteristics.

Authors:  Yifan Jiang; Linda-Liisa Veromann-Jürgenson; Jiayan Ye; Ülo Niinemets
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 7.  The Galling Truth: Limited Knowledge of Gall-Associated Volatiles in Multitrophic Interactions.

Authors:  Renee M Borges
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.753

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.