Literature DB >> 19704207

Remediation techniques for student performance problems after a comprehensive clinical skills assessment.

Varun Saxena1, Patricia S O'Sullivan, Arianne Teherani, David M Irby, Karen E Hauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Poor performance on a medical school comprehensive clinical skills assessment after core clerkships requires remediation. Little is known about techniques used to remedy students' skills deficits and their effectiveness. The authors identified remediation strategies used at U.S. medical schools and determined instructors' confidence in remediation.
METHOD: In the fall of 2007, the authors surveyed persons responsible for remediation at U.S. medical schools that conduct comprehensive clinical assessments and remediation. Respondents reported their use of four types of remediation strategies: (1) clinical activities, (2) independent study, (3) precepted video review of exam recording, and (4) organized group activities for deficits in history-taking, physical examination, knowledge, clinical reasoning, professionalism, and communication. The authors assessed confidence in remediation for the six skill areas and analyzed these measures using repeated-measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Fifty-three of 71 (74.6%) participants responded. Educators most commonly employ the precepted video review remediation activity across the six skill areas, and they use the clinical activities least commonly. Confidence in remediating the six skill areas was below the "agree" level. Confidence was highest for remediating history-taking and physical examination problems and lowest for professionalism.
CONCLUSION: Educators express modest confidence in remediating fourth-year students' clinical skills deficiencies. The finding that schools employ primarily video review for remediation suggests a potential need to augment opportunities for mentored skills practice to address deficits more effectively. The remediation literature similarly stresses the importance of multiple approaches tailored to particular deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19704207     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819fa832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

1.  Resident evaluation and remediation: a comprehensive approach.

Authors:  Jim S Wu; Bettina Siewert; Phillip M Boiselle
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-06

2.  Time to Loosen the Apron Strings: Cohort-based Evaluation of a Learner-driven Remediation Model at One Medical School.

Authors:  S Beth Bierer; Elaine F Dannefer; John E Tetzlaff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Is there a way for clinical teachers to assist struggling learners? A synthetic review of the literature.

Authors:  Elisabeth Boileau; Christina St-Onge; Marie-Claude Audétat
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2017-01-18

4.  Remediation of learners struggling with communication skills: a systematic review.

Authors:  Deema Al-Sheikhly; Linda Östlundh; Thurayya Arayssi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  A structured remediation program for communication skills.

Authors:  Pedro Morgado; Ana R Lemos; Sara Almeida; Joao J Cerqueira; Nuno Sousa
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-08-29

6.  Guidelines: The dos, don'ts and don't knows of remediation in medical education.

Authors:  Calvin L Chou; Adina Kalet; Manuel Joao Costa; Jennifer Cleland; Kalman Winston
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

7.  A practical approach to mentoring students with repeated performance deficiencies.

Authors:  Kevin McLaughlin; Pamela Veale; Joann McIlwrick; Janet de Groot; Bruce Wright
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Clinical-performance remediation program for dyscompetent medical students.

Authors:  Sun Jung Myung; Jae-June Yim; Sang Min Park; Jwa Seop Shin
Journal:  Korean J Med Educ       Date:  2013-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.