PURPOSE: A randomized phase II trial of two novel treatment strategies in the first-line management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients with performance status (PS) 2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were assigned to docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days in combination with either cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly (D + C) or bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days (D + B) for up to 4 cycles. Patients with responding or stable disease continued cetuximab or bortezomib until progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. RESULTS:Sixty-four patients were enrolled and 59 were included in this analysis. Complete or partial response rates were 13.3% and 10.3% for D + C and D + B, respectively. Median PFS was 3.4 months in the D + C arm and 1.9 months in the D + B arm. Corresponding figures for 6-month PFS were 27.8% and 13.8% and 5.0 and 3.9 months for median survival, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was 16% for D + C and 21% for D + B, whereas nonhematologic toxicities were observed in 63% and 44% of patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death in each arm. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the poor prognosis associated with a PS of 2 and the difficulty in translating recent advances in targeted therapy to this subset of patients. While the results in the D + C arm are numerically superior, neither combination met the prespecified PFS end point to justify further research in this setting.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: A randomized phase II trial of two novel treatment strategies in the first-line management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancerpatients with performance status (PS) 2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were assigned to docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days in combination with either cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly (D + C) or bortezomib 1.6 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days (D + B) for up to 4 cycles. Patients with responding or stable disease continued cetuximab or bortezomib until progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled and 59 were included in this analysis. Complete or partial response rates were 13.3% and 10.3% for D + C and D + B, respectively. Median PFS was 3.4 months in the D + C arm and 1.9 months in the D + B arm. Corresponding figures for 6-month PFS were 27.8% and 13.8% and 5.0 and 3.9 months for median survival, respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was 16% for D + C and 21% for D + B, whereas nonhematologic toxicities were observed in 63% and 44% of patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death in each arm. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the poor prognosis associated with a PS of 2 and the difficulty in translating recent advances in targeted therapy to this subset of patients. While the results in the D + C arm are numerically superior, neither combination met the prespecified PFS end point to justify further research in this setting.
Authors: C J Sweeney; J Zhu; A B Sandler; J Schiller; C P Belani; C Langer; J Krook; D Harrington; D H Johnson Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Rogerio C Lilenbaum; James E Herndon; Marcy A List; Chris Desch; Dorothy M Watson; Antonius A Miller; Stephen L Graziano; Michael C Perry; Wayne Saville; Philippe Chahinian; Jane C Weeks; Jimmie C Holland; Mark R Green Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael P Fanucchi; Frank V Fossella; Robert Belt; Ronald Natale; Panos Fidias; David P Carbone; Ramaswamy Govindan; Luis E Raez; Francisco Robert; Maria Ribeiro; Wallace Akerley; Karen Kelly; Steven A Limentani; Jeffrey Crawford; Hans-Joachim Reimers; Rita Axelrod; Oscar Kashala; Shihong Sheng; Joan H Schiller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edward S Kim; Ann M Mauer; William N William; Hai T Tran; Diane Liu; Jack J Lee; Paul Windt; Waun K Hong; Everett E Vokes; Roy S Herbst Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: C Gridelli; A Ardizzoni; T Le Chevalier; C Manegold; F Perrone; N Thatcher; N van Zandwijk; M Di Maio; O Martelli; F De Marinis Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Xiaofei Wang; Lin Gu; Ying Zhang; Daniel J Sargent; William Richards; Apar Kishor Ganti; Jeffery Crawford; Harvey Jay Cohen; Thomas Stinchcombe; Everett Vokes; Herbert Pang Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Filipa Lynce; Hongkun Wang; Emanuel F Petricoin; Paula R Pohlmann; Brandon Smaglo; Jimmy Hwang; Aiwu R He; Deepa S Subramaniam; John Deeken; John Marshall; Michael J Pishvaian Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Malamati Vreka; Ioannis Lilis; Maria Papageorgopoulou; Georgia A Giotopoulou; Marina Lianou; Ioanna Giopanou; Nikolaos I Kanellakis; Magda Spella; Theodora Agalioti; Vasileios Armenis; Torsten Goldmann; Sebastian Marwitz; Fiona E Yull; Timothy S Blackwell; Manolis Pasparakis; Antonia Marazioti; Georgios T Stathopoulos Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 12.701