Literature DB >> 19703866

Stable coronary artery disease: prognostic value of myocardial perfusion SPECT in relation to coronary calcium scoring--long-term follow-up.

Christopher Uebleis1, Alexander Becker, Ines Griesshammer, Paul Cumming, Christoph Becker, Michael Schmidt, Peter Bartenstein, Marcus Hacker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incremental prognostic value of coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring over single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging in long-term prognosis and survival of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients provided written informed consent to undergo CAC scoring according to a protocol that was approved by the local clinical institutional review board. Over a median follow-up time of 5.4 years, 260 patients with stable CAD were followed up for severe cardiac events (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction). CAC scanning and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging were performed at enrollment. Patients were stratified on the basis of well-established cutoff points for CAC score, summed stress score (SSS), and summed rest score (SRS). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the Cox proportional hazards model were used.
RESULTS: CAC score and SRS were identified as the only independent predictors of event-free survival. Patients with perfusion abnormalities at rest (SRS > or = 2), a CAC score greater than 400, or severe perfusion abnormalities under stress (SSS > or = 13) were identified as having significantly increased risk for subsequent severe cardiac events (P = .023, .0095, and .007, respectively). In addition, a CAC score greater than 400 offered incremental prognostic value over the scintigraphic scores alone (P = .028 with an SSS > 8; P = .008 with an SRS > or = 2).
CONCLUSION: CAC score and SRS were identified as independent predictors of severe cardiac events during long-term follow-up of patients with known CAD. CAC scores imparted superior risk stratification information as compared with SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging results alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19703866     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2531082137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  Monitoring anti-inflammatory therapies in patients with atherosclerosis: FDG PET emerges as the method of choice.

Authors:  M Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  The role of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Brian G Abbott; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Dennis A Calnon; Jeffrey A Leppo; Jamshid Maddahi; Matthew M Schumaecker; Leslee J Shaw; R Parker Ward; David G Wolinsky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Relationship between Calcium Score and Myocardial Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Coronary Disease.

Authors:  Fabio Paiva Rossini Siqueira; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita; Alair Augusto Sarmet M Damas Dos Santos; Marcelo Souto Nacif
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  [Cardiac SPECT/CT: correlation between atherosclerosis, significant coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion parameters in patients with known coronary artery disease].

Authors:  C Ubleis; C Rist; I Griesshammer; A Becker; C Becker; M Hacker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Adding calcium scoring to myocardial perfusion imaging: Does it alter physicians' therapeutic decision making?

Authors:  Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Ron Blankstein; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  The incremental value of coronary artery calcium scores to myocardial single photon emission computer tomography in risk assessment.

Authors:  Marcus Hacker; Christoph Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 9.  Debates over NICE Guideline Update: What Are the Roles of Nuclear Cardiology in the Initial Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain?

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Jahae Kim; Ho-Chun Song
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-08-28

10.  Coronary CT angiography offers further risk stratification in the management of patients with normal SPECT results.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Yalcin Hacioglu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.