PURPOSE: To assess ultrasonographic (US) examination results of the cervical part of the thoracic duct, to provide standard diameters, and to evaluate the diameter of the cervical thoracic duct in certain diseases suspected to involve an abnormal load of chyle (liver, heart, and inflammatory bowel diseases). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Diameter and variations of the cervical thoracic duct were assessed by using US in 265 healthy volunteers (age range, 21-82 years) from a population-based study, in 196 subjects with documented liver cirrhosis (age range, 19-87 years), in 68 subjects with chronic hepatitis (age range, 17-73 years), in 39 subjects with congestive heart failure (age range, 46-85 years), and in 17 subjects with inflammatory bowel disease (age range, 18-66 years). US examinations were performed with high-resolution linear probes (7-12 MHz). RESULTS: A standard imaging approach guided by anatomic structures was established. Dynamic imaging of the chyle flow and valve function was possible. The thoracic duct was visualized in 564 (96%) of 585 examinations. The average thoracic duct diameter in healthy volunteers was 2.5 mm, which was independent of the subjects' age. The diameter was significantly higher in subjects with congestive heart failure (6.3 mm, P < .0001) and liver cirrhosis (5.6 mm, P < .0001). Anatomic variations were present in 27% of subjects. CONCLUSION: High-resolution US with linear probes allows assessment of the cervical thoracic duct with high detection rates. Recognition of local anatomy, diameter, and chyle flow may aid functional assessment.
PURPOSE: To assess ultrasonographic (US) examination results of the cervical part of the thoracic duct, to provide standard diameters, and to evaluate the diameter of the cervical thoracic duct in certain diseases suspected to involve an abnormal load of chyle (liver, heart, and inflammatory bowel diseases). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Diameter and variations of the cervical thoracic duct were assessed by using US in 265 healthy volunteers (age range, 21-82 years) from a population-based study, in 196 subjects with documented liver cirrhosis (age range, 19-87 years), in 68 subjects with chronic hepatitis (age range, 17-73 years), in 39 subjects with congestive heart failure (age range, 46-85 years), and in 17 subjects with inflammatory bowel disease (age range, 18-66 years). US examinations were performed with high-resolution linear probes (7-12 MHz). RESULTS: A standard imaging approach guided by anatomic structures was established. Dynamic imaging of the chyle flow and valve function was possible. The thoracic duct was visualized in 564 (96%) of 585 examinations. The average thoracic duct diameter in healthy volunteers was 2.5 mm, which was independent of the subjects' age. The diameter was significantly higher in subjects with congestive heart failure (6.3 mm, P < .0001) and liver cirrhosis (5.6 mm, P < .0001). Anatomic variations were present in 27% of subjects. CONCLUSION: High-resolution US with linear probes allows assessment of the cervical thoracic duct with high detection rates. Recognition of local anatomy, diameter, and chyle flow may aid functional assessment.
Authors: Paul R Hess; David R Rawnsley; Zoltán Jakus; Yiqing Yang; Daniel T Sweet; Jianxin Fu; Brett Herzog; MinMin Lu; Bernhard Nieswandt; Guillermo Oliver; Taija Makinen; Lijun Xia; Mark L Kahn Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Chathura Bathiya Bandara Ratnayake; Alistair Brian James Escott; Anthony Ronald John Phillips; John Albert Windsor Journal: J Anat Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Xin Geng; Boksik Cha; Md Riaj Mahamud; Kim-Chew Lim; Robert Silasi-Mansat; Mohammad K M Uddin; Naoyuki Miura; Lijun Xia; Alexander M Simon; James Douglas Engel; Hong Chen; Florea Lupu; R Sathish Srinivasan Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Sheyanth Mohanakumar; Benjamin Kelly; Aida Luiza Ribeiro Turquetto; Mathias Alstrup; Luciana Patrick Amato; Milena Schiezari Ru Barnabe; João Bruno Dias Silveira; Fernando Amaral; Paulo Henrique Manso; Marcelo Biscegli Jatene; Vibeke Elisabeth Hjortdal Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2021-06
Authors: Lomani Archibald O'Hagan; John Albert Windsor; Anthony Ronald John Phillips; Maxim Itkin; Peter Spencer Russell; Seyed Ali Mirjalili Journal: J Anat Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 2.921
Authors: Ferdinand J Kammerer; Benedikt Schlude; Michael A Kuefner; Philipp Schlechtweg; Matthias Hammon; Michael Uder; Siegfried A Schwab Journal: Head Face Med Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 2.151