Literature DB >> 1970289

Beta-adrenoceptor blockers and calcium antagonists in the prophylaxis and treatment of migraine.

K E Andersson1, E Vinge.   

Abstract

Based on published reports of controlled double-blind studies, the efficacy of beta-receptor blockers and calcium antagonists in the prophylactic treatment of migraine is reviewed. Taking into consideration problems in trial design and evaluation of the effects of treatment, and the amount of documentation, it may be concluded that propranolol, metoprolol, timolol, nadolol and atenolol have been shown to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks in patients with common as well as classical migraine. The effect on duration and intensity of migraine attacks is less clear. Treatment effect is generally seen within 4 weeks, but seems to increase with time. Nonselective beta-receptor blockers as well as drugs selective for beta1-receptors may be effective, and their efficacy is comparable to that of other active antimigraine drugs. Available studies do not exclude the fact that beta-receptor blockers with partial agonist activity (intrinsic sympathomimetic activity) have an effect, but suggest that their efficacy is inferior to that of blockers lacking this property. Among the calcium antagonists tested for prophylactic effect in migraine, the effects of verapamil, nifedipine and diltiazem seem promising, but available documentation does not allow any definitive statements of efficacy to be made, particularly not for nifedipine and diltiazem. The ability of flunarizine to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks in patients with common and classical migraine is well documented; its effect on attack duration and intensity is less well established. The response rate is similar to that for beta-receptor blockers, and to that, for example, for pizotifen (pizotyline). Nimodipine also appears to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks, but the efficacy of this drug, compared with other alternatives, remains to be definitely established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1970289     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199039030-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  91 in total

1.  Nadolol: its use in the prophylactic treatment of migraine.

Authors:  R E Ryan; R E Ryan; A Sudilovsky
Journal:  Headache       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.887

2.  Nimodipine in migraine prophylaxis.

Authors:  E Ansell; T Fazzone; R Festenstein; E S Johnson; M Thavapalan; M Wilkinson; I Wozniak
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.292

3.  Nimodipine, a new calcium antagonist, in the prophylactic treatment of migraine.

Authors:  H J Gelmers
Journal:  Headache       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.887

4.  Letter: Practolol and migraine.

Authors:  F Sales; J L Bada
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-29       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Classic migraine: effective prophylaxis with metoprolol.

Authors:  P Kangasniemi; A R Andersen; P G Andersson; N E Gilhus; C Hedman; M Hultgren; S Vilming; J Olesen
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 6.  Flunarizine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  B Holmes; R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Flunarizine i.v. in the acute treatment of the migraine attack. A double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  D Soyka; Z Taneri; W Oestreich; R Schmidt
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  Propranolol and femoxetine, a HT-uptake inhibitor, in migraine prophylaxis. A double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  P G Andersson; E N Petersen
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  Propranolol (Inderal) and clonidine (Catapressan) in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. A comparative trial.

Authors:  B Kåss; K Nestvold
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.209

10.  Propranolol plasma levels and relief of migraine. Relationship between plasma propranolol and 4-hydroxypropranolol concentrations and clinical effects.

Authors:  P Cortelli; T Sacquegna; F Albani; A Baldrati; R D'Alessandro; A Baruzzi; E Lugaresi
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1985-01
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Neurology.

Authors:  A N Gale; J M Gibbs; A H Schapira; P K Thomas
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  The pharmacological management of migraine, part 2: preventative therapy.

Authors:  George Demaagd
Journal:  P T       Date:  2008-08

3.  Rare diseases mimicking acute vertebrobasilar artery thrombosis.

Authors:  U Meyding-Lamadé; K Rieke; D Krieger; M Forsting; K Sartor; C Sommer; W Hacke
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Should magnesium be given to every migraineur? No.

Authors:  Arpad Pardutz; Laszlo Vecsei
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  The prevention of migraine: a critical review with special emphasis on beta-adrenoceptor blockers.

Authors:  V Limmroth; M C Michel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Therapeutic Advances in Diabetes, Autoimmune, and Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Jinsha Liu; Joey Paolo Ting; Shams Al-Azzam; Yun Ding; Sepideh Afshar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Which ancillary properties of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs influence their therapeutic or adverse effects?: a review.

Authors:  P Turner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 18.000

Review 8.  Monoaminergic Receptors as Modulators of the Perivascular Sympathetic and Sensory CGRPergic Outflows.

Authors:  Bruno A Marichal-Cancino; Abimael González-Hernández; Enriqueta Muñoz-Islas; Carlos M Villalón
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 7.363

9.  Optimizing prophylactic treatment of migraine: Subtypes and patient matching.

Authors:  Michel Dib
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 10.  A link between gastrointestinal disorders and migraine: Insights into the gut-brain connection.

Authors:  Sheena K Aurora; Stephen B Shrewsbury; Sutapa Ray; Nada Hindiyeh; Linda Nguyen
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.887

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.