S M Gardiner1, J E March, P A Kemp, T Bennett. 1. Centre for Integrated Systems Biology & Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. sheila.gardiner@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In vitro evidence suggests that metabolism of anandamide by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) may be more important when the primary metabolic pathway [i.e. fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)] is inhibited. Thus, the first aim of the present study was to assess the effects of COX-2 and/or FAAH inhibition, on the cardiovascular actions of anandamide. The second aim was to compare the effects of anandamide with those of the metabolically stable analogue (i.e. methanandamide) and investigate mechanisms involved in responses to the latter in conscious rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rats were chronically instrumented for recording blood pressure, heart rate and renal, mesenteric and hindquarters vascular conductances in the freely moving state. KEY RESULTS: Inhibition of FAAH with URB597 (cyclohexycarbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl-ester) augmented the haemodynamic actions of anandamide, but there was no effect of COX-2 inhibition with parecoxib, either in the absence or the presence of URB597. Methanandamide caused CB(1) receptor-mediated renal and mesenteric vasoconstriction and evoked beta(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated hindquarters vasodilatation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: No evidence for an involvement of COX-2 in the systemic cardiovascular actions of anandamide could be demonstrated. Vasoconstrictor actions of methanandamide were shown to involve CB(1) receptors, whereas no involvement of CB(1) receptors in such actions of anandamide has been shown. However, beta(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated hindquarters vasodilatation, independent of CB(1) receptors, observed here with methanandamide, has previously been seen with anandamide and differs from previous results with other synthetic cannabinoids for which the response was CB(1) receptor-dependent. Thus, mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular actions of endocannabinoids and synthetic analogues appear to be agonist-specific.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In vitro evidence suggests that metabolism of anandamide by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) may be more important when the primary metabolic pathway [i.e. fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH)] is inhibited. Thus, the first aim of the present study was to assess the effects of COX-2 and/or FAAH inhibition, on the cardiovascular actions of anandamide. The second aim was to compare the effects of anandamide with those of the metabolically stable analogue (i.e. methanandamide) and investigate mechanisms involved in responses to the latter in conscious rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rats were chronically instrumented for recording blood pressure, heart rate and renal, mesenteric and hindquarters vascular conductances in the freely moving state. KEY RESULTS: Inhibition of FAAH with URB597 (cyclohexycarbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl-ester) augmented the haemodynamic actions of anandamide, but there was no effect of COX-2 inhibition with parecoxib, either in the absence or the presence of URB597. Methanandamide caused CB(1) receptor-mediated renal and mesenteric vasoconstriction and evoked beta(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated hindquarters vasodilatation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: No evidence for an involvement of COX-2 in the systemic cardiovascular actions of anandamide could be demonstrated. Vasoconstrictor actions of methanandamide were shown to involve CB(1) receptors, whereas no involvement of CB(1) receptors in such actions of anandamide has been shown. However, beta(2)-adrenoceptor-mediated hindquarters vasodilatation, independent of CB(1) receptors, observed here with methanandamide, has previously been seen with anandamide and differs from previous results with other synthetic cannabinoids for which the response was CB(1) receptor-dependent. Thus, mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular actions of endocannabinoids and synthetic analogues appear to be agonist-specific.
Authors: Satish Kathuria; Silvana Gaetani; Darren Fegley; Fernando Valiño; Andrea Duranti; Andrea Tontini; Marco Mor; Giorgio Tarzia; Giovanna La Rana; Antonio Calignano; Arcangela Giustino; Maria Tattoli; Maura Palmery; Vincenzo Cuomo; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Nat Med Date: 2002-12-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: J J Talley; S R Bertenshaw; D L Brown; J S Carter; M J Graneto; M S Kellogg; C M Koboldt; J Yuan; Y Y Zhang; K Seibert Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2000-05-04 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Charles W Schindler; Benjamin R Gramling; Zuzana Justinova; Eric B Thorndike; Michael H Baumann Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: B Malinowska; A Zakrzeska; C M Kurz; M Göthert; G Kwolek; P Wielgat; J J Braszko; E Schlicker Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Nubia S Lobato; Fernando P Filgueira; Roshini Prakash; Fernanda R Giachini; Adviye Ergul; Maria Helena C Carvalho; R Clinton Webb; Rita C Tostes; Zuleica B Fortes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 3.240