Literature DB >> 19702460

Neural mechanisms of verb argument structure processing in agrammatic aphasic and healthy age-matched listeners.

Cynthia K Thompson1, Borna Bonakdarpour, Stephen F Fix.   

Abstract

Processing of lexical verbs involves automatic access to argument structure entries entailed within the verb's representation. Recent neuroimaging studies with young normal listeners suggest that this involves bilateral posterior peri-sylvian tissue, with graded activation in these regions on the basis of argument structure complexity. The aim of the present study was to examine the neural mechanisms of verb processing using fMRI in older normal volunteers and patients with stroke-induced agrammatic aphasia, a syndrome in which verb, as compared to noun, production often is selectively impaired, but verb comprehension in both on-line and off-line tasks is spared. Fourteen healthy listeners and five age-matched aphasic patients performed a lexical decision task, which examined verb processing by argument structure complexity, namely, one-argument [i.e., intransitive (v1)], two-argument [i.e., transitive (v2)], and three-argument (v3) verbs. Results for the age-matched listeners largely replicated those for younger participants studied by Thompson et al. [Thompson, C. K., Bonakdarpour, B., Fix, S. C., Blumenfeld, H. K., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., et al. Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1753-1767, 2007]: v3 - v1 comparisons showed activation of the angular gyrus in both hemispheres and this same heteromodal region was activated in the left hemisphere in the (v2 + v3) - v1 contrast. Similar results were derived for the agrammatic aphasic patients, however, activation was unilateral (in the right hemisphere for three participants) rather than bilateral, likely because these patients' lesions extended to the left temporo-parietal region. All performed the task with high accuracy and, despite differences in lesion site and extent, they recruited spared tissue in the same regions as healthy subjects. Consistent with psycholinguistic models of sentence processing, these findings indicate that the posterior language network is engaged for processing verb argument structure and is crucial for semantic integration of argument structure information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19702460      PMCID: PMC2873169          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  75 in total

1.  The neural correlates of verb and noun processing. A PET study.

Authors:  D Perani; S F Cappa; T Schnur; M Tettamanti; S Collina; M M Rosa; F Fazio
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The neural reality of syntactic transformations: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Talma Hendler; Itamar Kahn; Dafna Ben-Bashat; Yosef Grodzinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

3.  Language-related brain function during word repetition in post-stroke aphasics.

Authors:  Masahiro Abo; Atushi Senoo; Shu Watanabe; Satoshi Miyano; Keiko Doseki; Nobuyuki Sasaki; Kazushige Kobayashi; Yoshiaki Kikuchi; Kyozo Yonemoto
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: an open-protocol study.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Marjorie Nicholas; Errol H Baker; Heidi Seekins; Masahito Kobayashi; Hugo Theoret; Felipe Fregni; Jose Maria-Tormos; Jacquie Kurland; Karl W Doron; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits.

Authors:  Marco Tettamanti; Giovanni Buccino; Maria Cristina Saccuman; Vittorio Gallese; Massimo Danna; Paola Scifo; Ferruccio Fazio; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Stefano F Cappa; Daniela Perani
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking.

Authors:  A Roelofs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-03

Review 7.  Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing.

Authors:  Yosef Grodzinsky; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 8.  The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke.

Authors:  Cathy J Price; Jenny Crinion
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 9.  The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke.

Authors:  K R Thulborn; P A Carpenter; M A Just
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  35 in total

1.  Parallel functional category deficits in clauses and nominal phrases: The case of English agrammatism.

Authors:  Honglei Wang; Masaya Yoshida; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 2.  Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research: issues of experimental design for relating cognitive to neural changes.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; David Caplan; Susan Edwards; Evy Visch-Brink; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Are networks for residual language function and recovery consistent across aphasic patients?

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Samuel Messing; Catherine Norise; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing: The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses.

Authors:  Sladjana Lukic; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; James Higgins; Todd B Parrish; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  The Cortical Organization of Syntax.

Authors:  William Matchin; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Network modulation during complex syntactic processing.

Authors:  Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Dorothee Saur; Wolfgang Mader; Björn Schelter; Sladjana Lukic; Eisha Wali; Jens Timmer; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The neural substrates of complex argument structure representations: Processing 'alternating transitivity' verbs.

Authors:  Aya Meltzer-Asscher; Julia Schuchard; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2013

8.  Recovery of offline and online sentence processing in aphasia: Language and domain-general network neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Elena Barbieri; Jennifer Mack; Brianne Chiappetta; Eduardo Europa; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Syntactic and morphosyntactic processing in stroke-induced and primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Aya Meltzer-Asscher; Soojin Cho; Jiyeon Lee; Christina Wieneke; Sandra Weintraub; M-Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Grammatical Impairments in PPA.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson; Jennifer E Mack
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.