Literature DB >> 19701044

Effect of mifepristone on abortion access in the United States.

Lawrence B Finer1, Junhow Wei.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the pattern of mifepristone uptake in the United States and whether the introduction of this drug has facilitated access to abortion services.
METHODS: Using data from a national census of abortion providers and from the U.S. distributor of mifepristone, we assessed the number and proportion of abortions performed using mifepristone, the distribution of mifepristone providers by provider type and medical specialty, and the geographic distribution of mifepristone and surgical providers.
RESULTS: The number of mifepristone providers increased from 208 in the last 2 months of 2000 to 700 in 2001, the first full year of availability, and to 902 in 2007. Some 158,000 mifepristone abortions were performed in 2007, representing an estimated 14% of all abortions and 21% of eligible early abortions. Physicians represented 51% of mifepristone providers but accounted for just 11% of abortions; most were obstetrician-gynecologists. The proportion of abortions in each state performed using mifepristone ranged from 0% to 80%. Most mifepristone abortions were performed at or near facilities that also provided surgical abortion. Only five mifepristone-only providers of 10 or more abortions were located farther than 50 miles from any surgical provider of 400 or more abortions.
CONCLUSION: Mifepristone has become an integral part of abortion provision in the United States and likely has contributed to a trend toward very early abortions. However, expectations that approval of mifepristone would result in a wider range of providers offering abortion have not yet been met, and mifepristone has not brought a major improvement in the geographic availability of abortion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19701044     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b2a74d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Trends in use of medical abortion in the United States: reanalysis of surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Andreea A Creanga; Suzanne B Zane
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  First-trimester medical abortion practices in Canada: National survey.

Authors:  Edith R Guilbert; Althea S Hayden; Heidi E Jones; Katharine O'Connell White; E Steven Lichtenberg; Maureen Paul; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Women's preferences for the location of abortion services: a pilot study in two Chicago clinics.

Authors:  Melissa B Logsdon; Arden Handler; Emily M Godfrey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

4.  Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa.

Authors:  Daniel A Grossman; Kate Grindlay; Todd Buchacker; Joseph E Potter; Carl P Schmertmann
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Contraception after medication abortion in the United States: results from a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Suzan Goodman; Daniel Grossman; Kara Cadwallader; Kirsten M J Thompson; Elizabeth Talmont; J Joseph Speidel; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Characteristics and Circumstances of U.S. Women Who Obtain Very Early and Second-Trimester Abortions.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Jenna Jerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Abortion education in Canadian family medicine residency programs.

Authors:  Daniel T Myran; Jillian Bardsley; Tania El Hindi; Kristine Whitehead
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Trends in medication abortion and the role of low-volume and nonmetropolitan mifepristone purchasers: 2008-2011 and 2014-2017.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-10-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.