Literature DB >> 19700780

Change in clinical practice after publication of guidelines on breast cancer treatment.

Haruhisa Fukuda1, Yuichi Imanaka, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Kazuhide Okuma, Takako Shirai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several studies raise questions about whether clinical practice guidelines actually guide practice. We evaluated patterns of use of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) over time to examine the effect of guideline publication.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of time-series data on breast cancer treatment. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for covariates including the patient's age, comorbidity status and admission year, to assess whether the use of BCS was higher after publication of treatment guidelines.
SETTING: Five teaching hospitals participating in the Quality Improvement/Indicator Project (QIP) in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: Female breast cancer patients who received surgical treatment at five teaching hospitals from January 1996 through December 2007 (n = 2199). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rates of use of BCS.
RESULTS: The proportion of BCS use increased from 26.4% before guideline publication to 59.9% after guideline publication in Japan. After controlling for other characteristics, the use of BCS has increased significantly over time, especially since 2001. Women aged 70 years and older (P=0.004) and those with any comorbidity (P < 0.001) were significantly less likely to receive BCS.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the adjusted proportion of BCS has increased dramatically since 2001, 2 years after guideline publication in Japan and this is consistent with a relationship between guideline publication and a change in this clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19700780     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  5 in total

1.  Information needs and Internet use in urological and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Beatriz Valero-Aguilera; Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo; José Francisco García-Gutiérrez; Jaime Jiménez-Pernett; José Manuel Cózar-Olmo; Rosario Guerrero-Tejada; Rubén Alba-Ruiz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Anik Giguère; France Légaré; Jeremy Grimshaw; Stéphane Turcotte; Michelle Fiander; Agnes Grudniewicz; Sun Makosso-Kallyth; Fredric M Wolf; Anna P Farmer; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 3.  Personalized medicine and oncology practice guidelines: a case study of contemporary biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Robin K Kelley; Stephanie L Van Bebber; Kathryn A Phillips; Alan P Venook
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 4.  Strategies for reducing regional variation in the use of surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bradley N Reames; Sarah P Shubeck; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  CareTrack Australia: assessing the appropriateness of adult healthcare: protocol for a retrospective medical record review.

Authors:  Tamara D Hunt; Shanthi A Ramanathan; Natalie A Hannaford; Peter D Hibbert; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Enrico Coiera; Richard O Day; Johanna I Westbrook; William B Runciman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.