Literature DB >> 19700728

Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information.

I Misztal1, A Legarra, I Aguilar.   

Abstract

Currently, genomic evaluations use multiple-step procedures, which are prone to biases and errors. A single-step procedure may be applicable when genomic predictions can be obtained by modifying the numerator relationship matrix A to H = A + A(Delta), where A(Delta) includes deviations from expected relationships. However, the traditional mixed model equations require H(-1), which is usually difficult to obtain for large pedigrees. The computations with H are feasible when the mixed model equations are expressed in an alternate form that also applies for singular H and when those equations are solved by the conjugate gradient techniques. Then the only computations involving H are in the form of Aq or A(Delta)q, where q is a vector. The alternative equations have a nonsymmetric left-hand side. Computing A(Delta)q is inexpensive when the number of nonzeros in A(Delta) is small, and the product Aq can be calculated efficiently in linear time using an indirect algorithm. Generalizations to more complicated models are proposed. The data included 10.2 million final scores on 6.2 million Holsteins and were analyzed by a repeatability model. Comparisons involved the regular and the alternative equations. The model for the second case included simulated A(Delta). Solutions were obtained by the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm, which works only with symmetric matrices, and by the bi-conjugate gradient stabilized algorithm, which also works with nonsymmetric matrices. The convergence rate associated with the nonsymmetric solvers was slightly better than that with the symmetric solver for the original equations, although the time per round was twice as much for the nonsymmetric solvers. The convergence rate associated with the alternative equations ranged from 2 times lower without A(Delta) to 3 times lower for the largest simulated A(Delta). When the information attributable to genomics can be expressed as modifications to the numerator relationship matrix, the proposed methodology may allow the upgrading of an existing evaluation to incorporate the genomic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19700728     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  117 in total

1.  Genetic variances of SNP loci for milk yield in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Petr Pešek; Josef Přibyl; Luboš Vostrý
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Identification systems and selection criteria for small ruminants among pastoralist communities in northern Kenya: prospects for a breeding programme.

Authors:  S M Mbuku; I S Kosgey; A K Kahi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Bayesian inference of genetic parameters based on conditional decompositions of multivariate normal distributions.

Authors:  Jon Hallander; Patrik Waldmann; Chunkao Wang; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic analysis of carcass and meat quality traits in Nelore cattle1.

Authors:  Daniel Gustavo M Gordo; Rafael Espigolan; Tiago Bresolin; Gerardo A Fernandes Júnior; Ana F B Magalhães; Camila U Braz; Willian Bruno Fernandes; Fernando Baldi; Lucia G Albuquerque
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  DAIRRy-BLUP: a high-performance computing approach to genomic prediction.

Authors:  Arne De Coninck; Jan Fostier; Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomic prediction using different estimation methodology, blending and cross-validation techniques for growth traits and visual scores in Hereford and Braford cattle.

Authors:  Gabriel Soares Campos; Fernando Antônio Reimann; Leandro Lunardini Cardoso; Carlos Eduardo Ranquetat Ferreira; Vinicius Silva Junqueira; Patricia Iana Schmidt; José Braccini Neto; Marcos Jun Iti Yokoo; Bruna Pena Sollero; Arione Augusti Boligon; Fernando Flores Cardoso
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Genome-wide association study and functional analysis of feet and leg conformation traits in Nellore cattle.

Authors:  Giovana Vargas; Haroldo H R Neves; Gregório Miguel F Camargo; Vânia Cardoso; Danísio P Munari; Roberto Carvalheiro
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Comparison of genetic parameters and estimated breeding values for worm resistance in meat sheep obtained using traditional and genomic models.

Authors:  Gleyson Vieira Dos Santos; Natanael Pereira da Silva Santos; Luiz Antonio Silva Figueiredo Filho; Fábio Barros Britto; Luciano Silva Sena; Tatiana Saraiva Torres; Paulo Luiz Souza Carneiro; José Lindenberg Rocha Sarmento
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.559

9.  Genetic variation in Japanese Holstein cattle for EBL development.

Authors:  Yasuko Inagaki; Tomoko Kobayashi; Yoshihito Suda; Kazuya Kusama; Kazuhiko Imakawa
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.