Literature DB >> 19700466

Characterization of photothermal flowering responses in maturity isolines of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] cv. Clark.

A P Upadhyay1, R H Ellis, R J Summerfield, E H Roberts, A Qi.   

Abstract

All eight isolines of three maturity genes (E(1)/e(1), E(2)/e(2), and E(3)/e(3)) of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] cv. Clark were grown in widely different combinations of photoperiod and temperature. Under the more inductive conditions, i.e. in a warm mean temperature (30 degrees C) when daylengths were less than the critical value (i.e. less than about 13 h), the isolines flowered at similar times (23-24 d). The responses of all isolines to temperature were also similar, if not identical. Increase in daylength above the critical photoperiod progressively delayed flowering until the time taken to flower (f) reached a maximum at the ceiling photoperiod. The relations between the rate of progress towards flowering (1/f) and photoperiod (between the critical and ceiling values) were linear. The coefficient characterizing the slope of the response (photoperiod sensitivity) varied amongst the isolines. These responses could be grouped into three categories of increasing sensitivity: (1) least sensitive, e(1)e(2)e(3), e(1)E(2)e(3), e(1)e(2)E(3); (2) intermediate, E(1)e(2)e(3), e(1)E(2)E(3), and (3) most sensitive, E(1)E(2)e(3), E(1)e(2)E(3), E(1)E(2)E(3). Thus, in the Clark cultivar genetic background, E(1) induces greater photoperiod sensitivity but neither E(2) nor E(3) on their own have any effect. However, both E(2) and E(3) together induce photoperiod sensitivity comparable to that induced by E(1) alone. Furthermore, in addition to this epistasis, either E(2) or E(3) has considerable epistatic effect on E(1), further increasing photoperiod sensitivity. The effects of these genes and their epistasis were also reflected in the extent of the maximum delays to flowering which occur when the ceiling photoperiod is exceeded, and also possibly in earliness in circumstances when photoperiods were below the critical value.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 19700466     DOI: 10.1093/aob/74.1.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  13 in total

1.  Use of field observations to characterise genotypic flowering responses to photoperiod and temperature: a soyabean exemplar.

Authors:  E H Roberts; A Qi; R H Ellis; R J Summerfield; R J Lawn; S Shanmugasundaram
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Expression of flowering-time genes in soybean E1 near-isogenic lines under short and long day conditions.

Authors:  Dhiraj Thakare; Saratha Kumudini; Randy D Dinkins
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  The alleles at the E1 locus impact the expression pattern of two soybean FT-like genes shown to induce flowering in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Dhiraj Thakare; Saratha Kumudini; Randy D Dinkins
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  The Soybean-Specific Maturity Gene E1 Family of Floral Repressors Controls Night-Break Responses through Down-Regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T Orthologs.

Authors:  Meilan Xu; Noriko Yamagishi; Chen Zhao; Ryoma Takeshima; Megumi Kasai; Satoshi Watanabe; Akira Kanazawa; Nobuyuki Yoshikawa; Baohui Liu; Tetsuya Yamada; Jun Abe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  GmRAV confers ecological adaptation through photoperiod control of flowering time and maturity in soybean.

Authors:  Yuhe Wang; Chongjing Xu; Jiafan Sun; Lidong Dong; Minmin Li; Ying Liu; Jianhui Wang; Xiaoming Zhang; Dongmei Li; Jingzhe Sun; Yuntong Zhang; Jinming Shan; Wenbin Li; Lin Zhao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 8.005

6.  Regulation of seed yield and agronomic characters by photoperiod sensitivity and growth habit genes in soybean.

Authors:  Elroy R Cober; Malcolm J Morrison
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Diurnal Expression Pattern, Allelic Variation, and Association Analysis Reveal Functional Features of the E1 Gene in Control of Photoperiodic Flowering in Soybean.

Authors:  Hong Zhai; Shixiang Lü; Hongyan Wu; Yupeng Zhang; Xingzheng Zhang; Jiayin Yang; Yaying Wang; Guang Yang; Hongmei Qiu; Tingting Cui; Zhengjun Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Association mapping of loci controlling genetic and environmental interaction of soybean flowering time under various photo-thermal conditions.

Authors:  Tingting Mao; Jinyu Li; Zixiang Wen; Tingting Wu; Cunxiang Wu; Shi Sun; Bingjun Jiang; Wensheng Hou; Wenbin Li; Qijian Song; Dechun Wang; Tianfu Han
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Genetic and molecular bases of photoperiod responses of flowering in soybean.

Authors:  Satoshi Watanabe; Kyuya Harada; Jun Abe
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Quantifying the Effects of Photoperiod, Temperature and Daily Irradiance on Flowering Time of Soybean Isolines.

Authors:  Elroy R Cober; Daniel F Curtis; Douglas W Stewart; Malcolm J Morrison
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2014-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.