S M Underwood1, A K McIndoe. 1. Sir Humphry Davy Department of Anaesthesia, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Marlborough Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK. susan.underwood@uhbristol.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We wished to ascertain in what way recent changes such as Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) and the implementation of the Working Time Directive (WTD) have affected clinical training and experience for anaesthetists in a teaching centre, in particular the provision of training in specialized fields of anaesthesia provided in the teaching hospital. METHODS: Data were extracted from the computerized system for every operating theatre in this Trust. This provided a continuous record of all operations undertaken, and has previously been validated as an accurate record against individual anaesthetists' personal logbooks. We compared recent data with that of 10 yr ago. RESULTS: Comparing data for 1997 and 2008 showed that registrars and post-fellowship senior registrars (SRs) in anaesthesia continue to be well supervised directly by consultants (49% and 39%) and subspeciality training has been protected in our department. Average case numbers for SRs increased from 442 to 623 yr(-1), including an increase in emergency workload and theatre cases undertaken during the evening and at night. Although average case numbers for both SRs and consultants increased, we detected a small decrease in average case numbers from 394 to 353 yr(-1) for pre-fellowship registrars. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of many pressures on training in the clinical setting, the number of cases and senior supervision in specialist modules for trainee anaesthetists in our teaching hospital has been maintained. Continuous monitoring of in-theatre supervision is one way of confirming that training is not compromised as changes occur in hospital workload.
BACKGROUND: We wished to ascertain in what way recent changes such as Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) and the implementation of the Working Time Directive (WTD) have affected clinical training and experience for anaesthetists in a teaching centre, in particular the provision of training in specialized fields of anaesthesia provided in the teaching hospital. METHODS: Data were extracted from the computerized system for every operating theatre in this Trust. This provided a continuous record of all operations undertaken, and has previously been validated as an accurate record against individual anaesthetists' personal logbooks. We compared recent data with that of 10 yr ago. RESULTS: Comparing data for 1997 and 2008 showed that registrars and post-fellowship senior registrars (SRs) in anaesthesia continue to be well supervised directly by consultants (49% and 39%) and subspeciality training has been protected in our department. Average case numbers for SRs increased from 442 to 623 yr(-1), including an increase in emergency workload and theatre cases undertaken during the evening and at night. Although average case numbers for both SRs and consultants increased, we detected a small decrease in average case numbers from 394 to 353 yr(-1) for pre-fellowship registrars. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of many pressures on training in the clinical setting, the number of cases and senior supervision in specialist modules for trainee anaesthetists in our teaching hospital has been maintained. Continuous monitoring of in-theatre supervision is one way of confirming that training is not compromised as changes occur in hospital workload.
Authors: H A Penny; M Kurien; E Wong; R Ahmed; E Ejenavi; M Lau; C Romaya; F Gohar; K L Dear; K Kapur; B Hoeroldt; A J Lobo; D S Sanders Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2015-02-11