Literature DB >> 19699863

ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients can be enrolled in randomized trials before emergent coronary intervention without sacrificing door-to-balloon time.

James C Blankenship1, Kimberly A Skelding, Thomas D Scott, Jeremy Buckley, Deborah K Zimmerman, Amy Temple, Jennifer Sartorius, Enrique Jimenez, Peter B Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multicenter trials are necessary to compare the effectiveness of new drugs and devices for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, enrollment of STEMI patients in clinical trials could be detrimental to patients if it significantly delayed reperfusion therapy. We sought to determine whether STEMI patients treated with PCI could be enrolled in clinical trials without prolonging door-to-balloon times.
METHODS: At a single PCI center between October 17, 2004, and December 31, 2007, patients were enrolled in 1 of 4 trials requiring central enrollment and informed consent if (1) a study was actively enrolling, (2) the patient met inclusion/exclusion criteria, (3) and a study nurse was available. Median door-to-balloon times were compared for patients enrolled in clinical trials compared to those not enrolled.
RESULTS: Of 581 STEMI patients treated with PCI, 123 were enrolled in clinical trials and 458 were not. For patients transferred for PCI, community hospital door-to-balloon times were similar for research and nonresearch patients (104 vs 108 minutes, P = .4). For patients presenting directly to the PCI center, median door-to-balloon times were similar for research (55 minutes) and nonresearch patients (44 minutes, P = .5) after adjustment for age, culprit artery, and operator.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI may be enrolled in clinical trials with no significant delay in achieving reperfusion. For patients presenting directly to the PCI center, median door-to-balloon times well under 90 minutes can be achieved even with enrollment into clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19699863     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  2 in total

1.  Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.

Authors:  Neal W Dickert; David Wendler; Chandan M Devireddy; Sara F Goldkind; Yi-An Ko; Candace D Speight; Scott Yh Kim
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Targeted Consent for Research on Standard of Care Interventions in the Emergency Setting.

Authors:  David Wendler; Neal W Dickert; Robert Silbergleit; Scott Y H Kim; Jeremy Brown
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.598

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.