Literature DB >> 19699114

Postoperative complications of fibular free flaps in mandibular reconstruction: an analysis of 25 consecutive cases.

André Chaine1, Poramate Pitak-Arnnop, Michael Hivelin, Kittipong Dhanuthai, Jacques-Charles Bertrand, Chloé Bertolus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze complications following fibular free flap (FFF) transfer for mandibular reconstruction using our definition of postoperative complications. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study presents our 4-year experiences with FFF for mandibular reconstruction by a single microsurgical team. Data were collected through patient record review and clinical evaluation by 2 independent assessors. We defined complications as any unwanted postoperative outcomes that compromised patient care. Early complication occurred within the first 2 weeks postoperatively; late complications occurred afterward.
RESULTS: Of 25 patients included, 13 patients (56%) experienced complications. Early and late complications occurred in 13 and 9 patients, respectively. These included flap loss, malunion, skin-paddle necrosis, orocutaneous fistula, wound dehiscence, hematoma, soft tissue contracture, intraoral hair growth, facial asymmetry, osteoradionecrosis, donor-site morbidity, and medical complications. Revision surgeries were performed in 10 patients, ranging from wound dressing to flap removal. All but 2 flaps survived, yielding an overall success rate of 92%. Most of the patients were alive without disease (92%) at the end of the study. Average follow-up was 47.2 months (range: 26-77).
CONCLUSION: Despite the small number of patients, these preliminary data suggest a relatively high frequency of complications following the FFF reconstruction based on our definition. Minor complications are common and should not be neglected because they may lead to devastating consequences. This should also be a part of informed consent for patients. Complications after the FFF transfer await keen evaluation to establish guidelines to improve end results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19699114     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  10 in total

1.  Enucleation of keratocystic odontogenic tumours: study interpretation, technical refinement and future research.

Authors:  Poramate Pitak-Arnnop
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fibula Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction: Identifying Risk Factors for Flap Failure and Analysis of Postoperative Complications in a Low Volume Setting.

Authors:  Pieter-Jan Verhelst; Flore Dons; Pieter-Jan Van Bever; Joseph Schoenaers; Lloyd Nanhekhan; Constantinus Politis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-06-05

3.  Nonvascularized Bone Graft Reconstruction of the Irradiated Murine Mandible: An Analogue of Clinical Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Kevin M Urlaub; Russell E Ettinger; Noah S Nelson; Jessie M Hoxie; Alicia E Snider; Joseph E Perosky; Yekaterina Polyatskaya; Alexis Donneys; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Evaluation of complications and flap losses in mandibular reconstruction with microvascularized fibula flap.

Authors:  Guilherme Klein Parise; Maria Isabela Guebur; Gyl Henrique Albrecht Ramos; Anne Karoline Groth; Alfredo Benjamin Duarte da Silva; Laurindo Moacir Sassi
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-25

5.  A Protocol for Management of the Hairs Problem in Oral Cavity Reconstruction by Submental Flap.

Authors:  Amin Rahpeyma; Saeedeh Khajehahmadi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-06-04

Review 6.  Mini-plate versus reconstruction bar fixation for oncologic mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Sobti; Kaleem S Ahmed; Thais Polanco; Marina Chilov; Marc A Cohen; Jay Boyle; Farooq Shahzad; Evan Matros; Jonas A Nelson; Robert J Allen
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.022

7.  Comparison of the Accuracy and Clinical Parameters of Patient-Specific and Conventionally Bended Plates for Mandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Henriette L Möllmann; Laura Apeltrath; Nadia Karnatz; Max Wilkat; Erik Riedel; Daman Deep Singh; Majeed Rana
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Maxillofacial free flap surgery outcomes in critical care: a single-center investigation looking for clues to improvement.

Authors:  Bruno Denis; Claire Gourbeix; Marine Coninckx; Jean-Philippe Foy; Chloé Bertolus; Jean-Michel Constantin; Vincent Degos
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 9.  Comparing the use of conventional and three-dimensional printing (3DP) in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ailis Truscott; Reza Zamani; Mohammad Akrami
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Radiofrequency: the next step for gingival depigmentation.

Authors:  Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Niels Christian Pausch
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.