Literature DB >> 19698807

The potential cost-effectiveness of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to the cervical cancer screening programme in South Africa.

Edina Sinanovic1, Jennifer Moodley, Mark A Barone, Sumaya Mall, Susan Cleary, Jane Harries.   

Abstract

This study was designed to answer the question of whether a cervical cancer prevention programme that incorporates a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is potentially more cost-effective than the current strategy of screening alone in South Africa. We developed a static Markov state transition model to describe the screening and management of cervical cancer within the South African context. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of adding HPV vaccination to the screening programme ranged from US $1078 to 1460 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and US$3320-4495 per life year saved, mainly depending on whether the study was viewed from a health service or a societal perspective. Using discounted costs and benefits, the threshold analysis indicated that a vaccine price reduction of 60% or more would make the vaccine plus screening strategy more cost-effective than the screening only approach. To address the issue of affordability and cost-effectiveness, the pharmaceutical companies need to make a commitment to price reductions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19698807     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  16 in total

Review 1.  The state of health economic research in South Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Karen L Rascati; Abiola O Oladapo; Star Khoza
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Screening and Treatment for Cervical Cancer in Tanzania: Implications for other Sub-Saharan African Countries.

Authors:  Stephanie Nelson; Jungyoon Kim; Fernando A Wilson; Amr S Soliman; Twalib Ngoma; Crispin Kahesa; Julius Mwaiselage
Journal:  Value Health Reg Issues       Date:  2016-05-19

Review 3.  Human papillomavirus vaccines: where do they fit in HIV-infected individuals?

Authors:  Cynthia Firnhaber; Timothy Wilkin
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.071

4.  The Price of Prevention: Cost Effectiveness of Biomedical HIV Prevention Strategies in South Africa.

Authors:  Nishila Moodley; Glenda Gray; Melanie Bertram
Journal:  Clin Res HIV AIDS       Date:  2016-11-27

Review 5.  The cost effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine Seto; Fawziah Marra; Adam Raymakers; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.431

6.  Human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in low-income and middle-income countries: guidance on the use of cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  Mark Jit; Nadia Demarteau; Elamin Elbasha; Gary Ginsberg; Jane Kim; Naiyana Praditsitthikorn; Edina Sinanovic; Raymond Hutubessy
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Cost-effectiveness of 2-dose human papillomavirus vaccination for 12-year-old girls in Zhejiang Province: implications for China's expanded program on immunization.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Hanqing He; Xuewen Tang; Shenyu Wang; Jun Zhang; Ting Wu; Zhiping Chen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Economic analyses to support decisions about HPV vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: a consensus report and guide for analysts.

Authors:  Mark Jit; Carol Levin; Marc Brisson; Ann Levin; Stephen Resch; Johannes Berkhof; Jane Kim; Raymond Hutubessy
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Modelling the cost-effectiveness of a new infant vaccine to prevent tuberculosis disease in children in South Africa.

Authors:  Liezl Channing; Edina Sinanovic
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 10.  Cervical cancer prevention and treatment research in Africa: a systematic review from a public health perspective.

Authors:  Sarah Finocchario-Kessler; Catherine Wexler; May Maloba; Natabhona Mabachi; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Elizabeth Bukusi
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.