Literature DB >> 19697437

Safety and efficacy of bidirectional chemotherapy for treatment of patients with peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer: Selection for cytoreductive surgery.

Yutaka Yonemura1, Yoshio Endou, Masaya Shinbo, Takuma Sasaki, Masamitu Hirano, Akiyoshi Mizumoto, Takayuki Matsuda, Nobuyuki Takao, Masumi Ichinose, Mitsukuni Mizuno, Masahiro Miura, Makoto Ikeda, Satoshi Ikeda, Gou Nakajima, Jou Yonemura, Takafumi Yuuba, Seiji Masuda, Hironobu Kimura, Nobuo Matsuki.   

Abstract

There is no standard treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from gastric cancer. New bidirectional chemotherapy (neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy protocol (NIPS)) was developed. The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of NIPS and to show the selection for cytoreductive surgery on PC from gastric cancer. Seventy-nine patients with PC from gastric cancer were treated with NIPS. A peritoneal port system was introduced into the abdominal cavity. The peritoneal wash cytological examination through a port was done before and after NIPS. The patients were treated with oral TS-1 twice a daily for 21 days, followed by a 1-week rest. On day 1, 8, and 15 from the start of oral TS-1 administration, 30 mg/m(2) of Docetaxel and 30 mg/m(2) of cisplatinum with 500 ml of saline were introduced into the peritoneal cavity through the port. A median course of oral TS-1 was 2.1 course and a median time of IP chemoterapy was 5.8. Peritoneal free cancer cells (PFCCs) had been detected in 65 (82.2%) patients before NIPS, and the positive cytology changed to be negative in 41 (63.0%) patients after NIPS. After NIPS, 41 patients underwent laparotomy, and complete cytoreduction was done in 32 (78%) patients. Complete cytoreduction was done in 27 (51.9%) of 52 patients with negative cytology but in only 4 (14.8%) of 27 patients with positive cytology (P < 0.001). Patients with negative cytology after NIPS survived significantly longer than those with positive cytology. The adverse effects after NIPS were mild and there was no treatment-related deaths. The grade 3/4 hematological adverse effects were found in 2 (2.6%) patients. Grade 3 renal toxicity and port site infection was found in three patients, respectively. NIPS using a port system is a safe and effective treatment for PC. Peritoneal wash cytology through a port system is a good indicator to select the patients to perform cytoreductive surgery. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19697437     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  57 in total

1.  Selection criteria for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ingmar Königsrainer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Updating controversies on the multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Javier Lacueva; Javier Gallego; Juan Antonio Díaz-González
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  The effect of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage therapy (EIPL) on stage III B + C and cytology-positive gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Toshiro Masuda; Masafumi Kuramoto; Shinya Shimada; Satoshi Ikeshima; Kenichiro Yamamoto; Kenichi Nakamura; Shinich Yoshimatsu; Masayuki Urata; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri; Olivier Glehen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Treatment outcomes of systemic chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from gastric cancer with no measurable disease: retrospective analysis from a single center.

Authors:  Sook Hee Hong; Yu Ri Shin; Sang Young Roh; Eun Kyoung Jeon; Kyo Yung Song; Cho Hyun Park; Hae Myung Jeon; Young Seon Hong
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  A critical analysis of the cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combo in the clinical management of advanced gastric cancer: an effective multimodality approach with scope for improvement.

Authors:  Maneesh K Beeharry; Wen-Tao Liu; Xue-Xin Yao; Min Yan; Zheng-Gang Zhu
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 7.  Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intraperitoneal cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Csilla Hasovits; Stephen Clarke
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Primary retroperitoneal mullerian adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ayman Elnemr; Yutaka Yonemura; Masaya Shinbo; Eisei Nishino
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2010-03-31

10.  Aggressive locoregional surgical therapy for gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Deepa Magge; Mazen Zenati; Arun Mavanur; Joshua Winer; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Heather Jones; Amer Zureikat; Matthew Holtzman; Kenneth Lee; Steven Ahrendt; James Pingpank; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.