Literature DB >> 19697173

Safety of repeated sessions of galvanic vestibular stimulation following stroke: a single-case study.

David Wilkinson1, Olga Zubko, Mohamed Sakel.   

Abstract

PRIMARY
OBJECTIVE: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) involves the delivery of small electrical current to the part of the scalp that overlies the vestibular nerves. A single, brief session transiently reduces certain types of stroke impairment with no reported side-effects. It is anticipated that further reductions will occur if the duration and frequency of stimulation is increased. The aim of the present study was to assess whether this increased exposure is well-tolerated and consistent with patient well-being. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: GVS was administered to a stroke sufferer on 5 consecutive days, each for 30 minutes at an intensity of 1 milliamp. Tolerability was monitored via a range of behavioural scales sensitive to side-effects experienced during and after stimulation.
RESULTS: No unpleasant sensations were reported during stimulation and no deterioration in global function was observed over the 5-day period.
CONCLUSION: The results imply that repeated applications of GVS are tolerable at the parameter settings applied and provide the basis for larger-scale investigations of safety and efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19697173     DOI: 10.1080/02699050903232541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Inj        ISSN: 0269-9052            Impact factor:   2.311


  5 in total

Review 1.  Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation: an emerging treatment option for bilateral vestibulopathy.

Authors:  Max Wuehr; Julian Decker; Roman Schniepp
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  No evidence for after-effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on motion perception.

Authors:  Aram Keywan; Hiba Badarna; Klaus Jahn; Max Wuehr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation modulates the amplitude of EEG synchrony patterns.

Authors:  Diana J Kim; Vignan Yogendrakumar; Joyce Chiang; Edna Ty; Z Jane Wang; Martin J McKeown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Modulation of cortical vestibular processing by somatosensory inputs in the posterior insula.

Authors:  Teruo Hashimoto; Miki Taoka; Shigeru Obayashi; Yukihiro Hara; Michio Tanaka; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Effects of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation During a Bimanual Tracking Robotic Task.

Authors:  Bulmaro A Valdés; Carlo Menon
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.