Literature DB >> 19697042

[Pareto optimal communication of the medical qualities of practicing ophthalmologists: a new option for patient information?].

C Thielscher1, S Rödder, M Schütte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This investigation analyzed the possibility to provide information about the medical qualities of ophthalmologists to make it easier for patients to find the right physician in a Pareto optimal way, i.e. to supply information so that nobody is harmed and at least one derives benefits.
METHODS: Extensive interviews with key deciders in the system for ophthalmological care were carried out and analyzed.
RESULTS: Pareto optimization is possible. However, implementation is not yet feasible mainly because of legal and economic restrictions and because of difficulties of the measuring system. In order to come to a result, a major medical, economic and legal effort would be required which is unlikely to come into place in the short-term.
CONCLUSION: At least in the near future there will be no new Pareto optimal information systems available for patients in order to find the appropriate ophthalmologist. In the mid-term the situation could change if the open questions can be resolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19697042     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-009-2031-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  4 in total

1.  Identifying high-quality hospitals: consult the ratings or flip a coin?

Authors:  Sean Michael O'Brien; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-09

2.  Long-term future of telemedicine in Germany: the patient's, physician's, and payer's perspective.

Authors:  Christian Thielscher; Charles R Doarn
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Disclosure of individual surgeon's performance rates during informed consent: ethical and epistemological considerations.

Authors:  Ingrid Burger; Kathryn Schill; Steven Goodman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Conflicting measures of hospital quality: ratings from "Hospital Compare" versus "Best Hospitals".

Authors:  Lakshmi K Halasyamani; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.960

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.