Literature DB >> 19697015

Optical microscopy versus scanning electron microscopy in urolithiasis.

Y M Fazil Marickar1, P R Lekshmi, Luxmi Varma, Peter Koshy.   

Abstract

Stone analysis is incompletely done in many clinical centers. Identification of the stone component is essential for deciding future prophylaxis. X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) still remains a distant dream for routine hospital work. It is in this context that optical microscopy is suggested as an alternate procedure. The objective of this article was to assess the utility of an optical microscope which gives magnification of up to 40x and gives clear picture of the surface of the stones. In order to authenticate the morphological analysis of urinary stones, SEM and elemental distribution analysis were performed. A total of 250 urinary stones of different compositions were collected from stone clinic, photographed, observed under an optical microscope, and optical photographs were taken at different angles. Twenty-five representative samples among these were gold sputtered to make them conductive and were fed into the SEM machine. Photographs of the samples were taken at different angles at magnifications up to 4,000. Elemental distribution analysis (EDAX) was done to confirm the composition. The observations of the two studies were compared. The different appearances of the stones under optical illuminated microscopy were mostly standardized appearances, namely bosselations of pure whewellite, spiculations of weddellite, bright yellow colored appearance of uric acid, and dirty white amorphous appearance of phosphates. SEM and EDAX gave clearer pictures and gave added confirmation of the stone composition. From the references thus obtained, it was possible to confirm the composition by studying the optical microscopic pictures. Higher magnification capacity of the SEM and the EDAX patterns are useful to give reference support for performing optical microscopy work. After standardization, routine analysis can be performed with optical microscopy. The advantage of the optical microscope is that, it is easy to use and samples can be analyzed in natural color.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19697015     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-009-0211-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  6 in total

1.  SEM/EDS evaluation of porcelain adherence to gold-coated cast titanium.

Authors:  K M Lee; Z Cai; J A Griggs; L Guiatas; D J Lee; T Okabe
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 2.  Metabolic fingerprinting in disease diagnosis: biomedical applications of infrared and Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  David I Ellis; Royston Goodacre
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis studies of human pineal concretions.

Authors:  T Kodaka; R Mori; K Debari; M Yamada
Journal:  J Electron Microsc (Tokyo)       Date:  1994-10

4.  Double-layer coating for high-resolution low-temperature scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  P Walther; E Wehrli; R Hermann; M Müller
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: new insights after 14 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Eric N Taylor; Meir J Stampfer; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  An understanding of renal stone development in a mixed oxalate-phosphate system.

Authors:  Xiangying Guan; Lijun Wang; Anja Dosen; Ruikang Tang; Rossman F Giese; Jennifer L Giocondi; Christine A Orme; John R Hoyer; George H Nancollas
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.882

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.