OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery calcification is responsible for an estimated 5% of ischaemic strokes. Carotid doppler sonography (DS) is a frequently used non-invasive method for assessing carotid artery stenosis and calcification. This study assessed the utility of panoramic radiography to detect any carotid artery calcification in patients with and without coronary artery disease, as well as the level of agreement between panoramic radiographs and DS findings. METHODS: Ninety subjects who underwent coronary angiography for any reason in Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Science during an 11 month period received a DS assessment and panoramic radiograph. The radiopacities adjacent to the cervical vertebrae at or below the intervertebral space between C3-C4 were diagnosed as carotid artery calcifications. Carotid calcifications were scored as present or absent and pattern of calcification was noted by a maxillofacial radiologist who was blind to the angiogram and sonogram results. The final sample population was 84 subjects, providing data on 168 carotid arteries. RESULTS: The panoramic radiograph had a sensitivity of 66.6% and a positive predictive value of 45% for detecting carotid artery calcifications in patients whose angiograms confirmed the coronary artery disease. It had 50% sensitivity in patients with normal angiogram. The level of agreement between panoramic radiographs and DS results was weak. CONCLUSION: Because of low sensitivity and positive predictive value, the panoramic radiograph can not be considered an accurate or reliable method for detecting carotid artery calcification.
OBJECTIVES: Carotid artery calcification is responsible for an estimated 5% of ischaemic strokes. Carotid doppler sonography (DS) is a frequently used non-invasive method for assessing carotid artery stenosis and calcification. This study assessed the utility of panoramic radiography to detect any carotid artery calcification in patients with and without coronary artery disease, as well as the level of agreement between panoramic radiographs and DS findings. METHODS: Ninety subjects who underwent coronary angiography for any reason in Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Science during an 11 month period received a DS assessment and panoramic radiograph. The radiopacities adjacent to the cervical vertebrae at or below the intervertebral space between C3-C4 were diagnosed as carotid artery calcifications. Carotid calcifications were scored as present or absent and pattern of calcification was noted by a maxillofacial radiologist who was blind to the angiogram and sonogram results. The final sample population was 84 subjects, providing data on 168 carotid arteries. RESULTS: The panoramic radiograph had a sensitivity of 66.6% and a positive predictive value of 45% for detecting carotid artery calcifications in patients whose angiograms confirmed the coronary artery disease. It had 50% sensitivity in patients with normal angiogram. The level of agreement between panoramic radiographs and DS results was weak. CONCLUSION: Because of low sensitivity and positive predictive value, the panoramic radiograph can not be considered an accurate or reliable method for detecting carotid artery calcification.