PURPOSE: To compare outcomes after switching from intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) to ranibizumab (Lucentis) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with neovascular AMD who were switched from treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab to intravitreal ranibizumab once ranibizumab became commercially available. All reviewed patients had at least three bevacizumab injections before being switched to ranibizumab. The treatment outcomes included comparisons of visual acuity and dosing frequency while receiving both drugs. RESULTS: Eighty-four eyes met the inclusion criteria. Mean baseline visual acuity was 20/100. Mean duration of bevacizumab treatment was 7.1 months followed by 7.3 months with ranibizumab (P = 0.68). Best-obtained visual acuity during treatment was 20/63 with bevacizumab and 20/63 with ranibizumab (P = 0.5). Last mean visual acuity after receiving bevacizumab at the time of the first ranibizumab injection was 20/80. Mean visual acuity at the last ranibizumab follow-up visit was 20/80 (P = 0.49). Mean injection rates per month while receiving bevacizumab and ranibizumab were 0.66 (P = 0.98). CONCLUSION: In this subset of patients with neovascular AMD switched from bevacizumab to ranibizumab therapy, there were no apparent differences in visual acuity outcomes or injection rates. Larger prospective studies are under way to directly compare these drugs for the treatment of neovascular AMD.
PURPOSE: To compare outcomes after switching from intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) to ranibizumab (Lucentis) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients with neovascular AMD who were switched from treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab to intravitreal ranibizumab once ranibizumab became commercially available. All reviewed patients had at least three bevacizumab injections before being switched to ranibizumab. The treatment outcomes included comparisons of visual acuity and dosing frequency while receiving both drugs. RESULTS: Eighty-four eyes met the inclusion criteria. Mean baseline visual acuity was 20/100. Mean duration of bevacizumab treatment was 7.1 months followed by 7.3 months with ranibizumab (P = 0.68). Best-obtained visual acuity during treatment was 20/63 with bevacizumab and 20/63 with ranibizumab (P = 0.5). Last mean visual acuity after receiving bevacizumab at the time of the first ranibizumab injection was 20/80. Mean visual acuity at the last ranibizumab follow-up visit was 20/80 (P = 0.49). Mean injection rates per month while receiving bevacizumab and ranibizumab were 0.66 (P = 0.98). CONCLUSION: In this subset of patients with neovascular AMD switched from bevacizumab to ranibizumab therapy, there were no apparent differences in visual acuity outcomes or injection rates. Larger prospective studies are under way to directly compare these drugs for the treatment of neovascular AMD.
Authors: L Tiosano; O Segal; N Mathalone; A Pollack; R Ehrlich; I Klemperer; Y Barak; I Moroz; I Chowers; M Goldstein Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Francesco Parmeggiani; Donato Gemmati; Ciro Costagliola; Francesco Semeraro; Paolo Perri; Sergio D'Angelo; Mario R Romano; Katia De Nadai; Adolfo Sebastiani; Carlo Incorvaia Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Justis P Ehlers; Kevin Wang; Rishi P Singh; Amy S Babiuch; Andrew P Schachat; Alex Yuan; Jamie L Reese; Laura Stiegel; Sunil K Srivastava Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-03